From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Subject: Re: kdesu security update needed
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 20:52:34 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL1_imngvefzyKohmZLVrL3qKR_zDcE15=52+mGjfOz0rKd52A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160929152353.GA6330@jasmine>
	<CAL1_imnxTYOJedGRgXnBcpT-Hp6KxFksx5JDAkOj0eZOu3iqZg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42016)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bpgRm-0003pD-2D
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:52:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bpgRh-0001rv-Sl
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:52:41 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::230]:34637)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bpgRg-0001r0-Lt
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:52:37 -0400
Received: by mail-yw0-x230.google.com with SMTP id g192so54992408ywh.1
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL1_imnxTYOJedGRgXnBcpT-Hp6KxFksx5JDAkOj0eZOu3iqZg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Ah just checked our linter doesn't flag a CVE, so I think we're ok...