From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Craven Subject: Re: Free firmware - A redefinition of the term and a new metric for it's measurement. Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:01:10 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20170214131548.35dafcfc@second-laptop> <87poik5y8l.fsf@openmailbox.org> <5a2f7929-ce4c-15ec-942d-5b101c47cec0@alaskasi.com> Reply-To: Workgroup for fully free GNU/Linux distributions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5a2f7929-ce4c-15ec-942d-5b101c47cec0@alaskasi.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gnu-linux-libre-bounces+gldg-gnu-linux-libre=m.gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: "gnu-linux-libre" To: Christopher Howard Cc: guix-devel , Workgroup for fully free GNU/Linux distributions , Adonay Felipe Nogueira List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org > David, I think you need to give up wasting your time trying to convince > a Gnu/Linux *Libre* list that proprietary kernel blobs are a good idea. > Most people are here because they care more about freedom than getting > the support of every manufacturer on the market. If you want to make > headway, just register at any "Linux" forum on the web and you'll find > that 80% of the people there already agree with you. I really love guixsd and want people to use it. That's the only reason I'm trying to convince anyone of anything.