From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Craven Subject: Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 11:35:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <877f9kufxx.fsf@elephly.net> <87shs7xno6.fsf@gnu.org> <8737k7urk0.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49415) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bso2l-0006bn-O5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 05:35:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bso2g-0002hp-7E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 05:35:46 -0400 Received: from mail-yb0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c09::233]:33507) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bso2e-0002fH-9p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 05:35:41 -0400 Received: by mail-yb0-x233.google.com with SMTP id e20so23521199ybb.0 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 02:35:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8737k7urk0.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel > I have no problems dropping Texmaker. I=E2=80=99m not even using it. That would be a shame, but I'm not using it either... I don't think there's a problem with bundling in this case, I just don't understand why you where against bundling in cargo's case, but not this one, that's all. I'm all for striving for ideals and perfectionism, as long as we keep in mind that nothing is perfect and stay pragmatic.