From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field.
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 15:00:42 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL1_immp2-c-CqBG9+BByzR=h_t-yraDqrODkCTSKpXbaVLcow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOFm3uHFc+EF=zJ1PS-oPjdZxsAA=4EUN_uvTPgYfG2CgcDTkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87r39zcfkz.fsf@gnu.org> <871t1zoz98.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87invbc6hn.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_im=96LRQipqa31PzOc79pAHxG7fYO1Q0vDytNxgp7f1qBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ziombyrx.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_immTf49VOT5czhgN4ffzrm5GiTAyZXeqc5eCdJP29y-ANg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL1_im=-7v9H7dSfMYSgkb9sVj8AzOGPfhLwtzquajAWU+udTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87popglv3u.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_imm4fXxErjsgDhd92Jnj7=nXvRxjXRaVBTftL_3JdenZNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87lh04ltg2.fsf@gnu.org>
	<32ade0cc-b971-a3fa-ea92-9b313955a373@uq.edu.au>
	<CAL1_im=xCMu-gvabBMBOvqw01TabUmUPEZAKrT9Q62uYcMGorg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4e35f009-ba71-f430-65e6-e986365b0c77@uq.edu.au>
	<87twesd9jw.fsf@elephly.net>
	<CAL1_immboQe+fGnADFaCoR4QsgtsYNE4MifkXoNrkmj20eQ7Xg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k2fnz7zl.fsf@gmail.com> <87ziojb6kj.fsf@elephly.net>
	<87lh02gzeo.fsf@gmail.com> <87vaz6bcr1.fsf@elephly.net>
	<CAL1_imnBo0h_XzWong3B36tgUSU441eoHi+xJ-jgx8sk97+vWQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87vaz5rtzk.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57719)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bYYYW-0000sR-S8
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 09:00:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bYYYQ-0005lq-IS
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 09:00:52 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236]:36530)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bYYYP-0005jq-BI
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 09:00:46 -0400
Received: by mail-yw0-x236.google.com with SMTP id u134so6119019ywg.3
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 06:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87vaz5rtzk.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

> Thanks, but I wouldn't like to participate in such a discussion.

Yeah, I get the feeling that no one does. That's why saying something
is an FSDG issue is like saying "we won't accept your patch and won't
discuss with you why".

> I just don't see a problem in accepting this patch as I don't
> understand Mathieu's and Mark's concerns about FSDG compliance, but I'm
> not competent in this area, so I let other people judge.

Can you please explain why you don't feel competent? It's written in plain
English, not AES encrypted English, so I have difficulty understanding
why people think they can't read it and form an opinion about it (not this
issue in particular, but more general any issue that comes up), and I don't
just mean you either, but a few people have said this...