From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Craven Subject: Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field. Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 02:18:00 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20160805145804.26753-1-david@craven.ch> <87y44af52m.fsf@gmail.com> <87shuit01e.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg60g79l.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8gog154.fsf@gnu.org> <87vazcce0a.fsf@gnu.org> <87r39zcfkz.fsf@gnu.org> <871t1zoz98.fsf@gmail.com> <87invbc6hn.fsf@gnu.org> <87ziombyrx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33653) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWukC-0006Bj-Fa for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 20:18:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWuk8-0003j1-8N for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 20:18:07 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-x242.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::242]:33240) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWuk7-0003iM-1Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 20:18:04 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-x242.google.com with SMTP id z8so25457499ywa.0 for ; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:18:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ziombyrx.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mathieu Lirzin Cc: guix-devel , Alex Kost > If I disagree with you doesn't mean I am wrong. Please don't act as if > you were in a position to decide who is wrong. You voiced your concern, I tried to find common ground. You referred to the FSDG. I read it to understand. You told me it was just my opinion of what is says, and referred me to a mailing list thread. I read the thread and asked how it relates. You told me you did not have to provide an answer and I had to go on some mailing list to start a discussion, so that other people can argue for you. I haven't heard you provide an argument other that repeating it's an FSDG issue, it's an FSDG issue. That sounds to me like someone who's out of ammo but not willing to admit it. > Trying to persuade me that it would be better for my reputation to agree with you won't work. One can try. > Sorry, but I don't understand what you are trying to say. Trying to change the subject and end the mail with a smiley. Not that I'm particularly skilled at it ;-)