From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field.
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:23:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL1_imkS+bUoufDfxsRhnJ0uXN0W2SfrLiub0DFUrFZjfnhJgg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOFm3uHFc+EF=zJ1PS-oPjdZxsAA=4EUN_uvTPgYfG2CgcDTkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL1_im=Dx++=-enXKKr8Y7PoiSk2OucpbhFav3-hKdn8FSj=TQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87eg60g79l.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_imnPANQfq2WCDDWCWtSEtEhWD2Ldt_Ziteq6cik5HuxPEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87a8gog154.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_imnYuTu7bT=yKyCfKP5ud2VF3m3HHuT3bTOzV4=8j3ehPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87vazcce0a.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_im=zUwVSU6dQ7WkzYozoBEBbZLAp_njrP-gT1DQ6eACmqg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87r39zcfkz.fsf@gnu.org> <871t1zoz98.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87invbc6hn.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_im=96LRQipqa31PzOc79pAHxG7fYO1Q0vDytNxgp7f1qBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ziombyrx.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_immTf49VOT5czhgN4ffzrm5GiTAyZXeqc5eCdJP29y-ANg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL1_im=-7v9H7dSfMYSgkb9sVj8AzOGPfhLwtzquajAWU+udTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87popglv3u.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_imm4fXxErjsgDhd92Jnj7=nXvRxjXRaVBTftL_3JdenZNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87lh04ltg2.fsf@gnu.org>
	<32ade0cc-b971-a3fa-ea92-9b313955a373@uq.edu.au>
	<CAL1_im=xCMu-gvabBMBOvqw01TabUmUPEZAKrT9Q62uYcMGorg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4e35f009-ba71-f430-65e6-e986365b0c77@uq.edu.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43646)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bXTTU-00070p-13
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:23:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bXTTP-0005Q7-Ie
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:23:11 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22b]:36833)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <david@craven.ch>) id 1bXTTO-0005Pn-B4
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:23:07 -0400
Received: by mail-yw0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u134so25063895ywg.3
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 06:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4e35f009-ba71-f430-65e6-e986365b0c77@uq.edu.au>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>

> the technical issue at hand

I disagree that it's a technical issue. Technical issues can be
reasoned about and can be fixed. This issue isn't technical.

> I think it would be good to get further opinions on the technical issue at hand

How do we get further opinions on the issue?

> I'm afraid I don't respect my own enough to contribute it

I think this contradicts the first part of the sentence. If no one is
willing to contribute their opinion this issue will get stale.