From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>
Subject: Re: gobject-introspection typelibs and shared libraries
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:27:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKrPhPPh=4ti0=QejffwFkciYM-Ovko1p+KHJgF-BEhJ2U-TOg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKrPhPM-oiMMrBpZ=gCyATRGUBFBh7bT9+rsNrcXOmG6EszVSw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ppbvkwzj.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPPmAzQA1o+kUgb=NDex_+1rbTkoYuzC9uO6Q9=d3R4+ag@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k322cx77.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPMgDOqu66aGkQMBin4ZFOnbwVcO_+kYaPYD5ur17pKNKA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87oardq3n3.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPPTtio_2-PRr7qc-FBvP3xynkVV8bt_rSPkFpczhHafJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54555)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1XyRNb-0005TM-6E
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:27:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1XyRNa-0006yw-5L
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:27:31 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAKrPhPPTtio_2-PRr7qc-FBvP3xynkVV8bt_rSPkFpczhHafJQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org> wrote:
> I've then updated pix-buf to the latest and it builds fine, but have 2
> out of 74 test failures.

gdk-pixbuf 2.31.2 (latest) fails 2 tests, but 2.31.1 passes all of them.

Fede