From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Federico Beffa Subject: Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"? Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 18:23:19 +0200 Message-ID: References: <878tzkhmah.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45877) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1azRUI-0002JD-St for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2016 12:23:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1azRUG-00046e-Iu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2016 12:23:21 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]:36233) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1azRUG-00046Z-Cs for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2016 12:23:20 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id s184so41697707vkb.3 for ; Sun, 08 May 2016 09:23:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878tzkhmah.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: Guix-devel On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Alex Kost wrote: > I should have asked this when emacs-build-system was introduced. Why > does it put emacs packages in sub-directories of > "/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d"? It looks more natural to me just to > use "/share/emacs/site-lisp". > > I don't see any potential conflicts here: some packages will put their > elisp files right in the site-lisp dir (gnu-build-system does it by > default), and emacs-build-system can just use > "/share/emacs/site-lisp/" sub-directories. > > "guix.d" seems redundant to me. What do people think? Answer here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-06/msg00398.html Regards, Fede