From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Federico Beffa Subject: reproducibility Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:53:27 +0100 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57273) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHr9F-00064r-Kl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 05:53:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHr9E-0000hW-LP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 05:53:29 -0500 Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]:36841) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHr9E-0000hS-Hj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 05:53:28 -0500 Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id n1so49743520vkb.3 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 02:53:28 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Guix-devel Hi, I've noticed that a derivation is a function of the order of the inputs. As an example, the following two input orders give rise to two distinct derivations: A) (inputs `(("texlive" ,texlive) ("texinfo" ,texinfo) ("m4" ,m4) ("libx11" ,libx11)) B) (inputs `(("texinfo" ,texinfo) ("texlive" ,texlive) ("m4" ,m4) ("libx11" ,libx11)) Is this intentional? Regards, Fede