From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Federico Beffa Subject: Re: gobject-introspection typelibs and shared libraries Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:07:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ppbvkwzj.fsf@gnu.org> <87k322cx77.fsf@gnu.org> <87oardq3n3.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3202k5u.fsf@netris.org> <87fvco2jgl.fsf@netris.org> <871to7q4a2.fsf@gnu.org> <87k31zll2s.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9wumz6f.fsf@gnu.org> <87zj9m8m7p.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq4p3xfe.fsf@gnu.org> <871tmv4t65.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39567) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YCAN7-0005T5-Qh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:07:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YCAN6-0007K6-SZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:07:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <871tmv4t65.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote= : > Federico Beffa skribis: > >> A different look at aesthetics: Back in the mid '90, when Linux was >> still an underground curiosity, many UNIX admins were starting to >> install GNU user-land applications. To avoid name clashes with the >> vendor versions of programs they were prefixing all GNU applications >> with a 'g'. So, the GNU version of 'ls' was named 'gls', 'awk' -> >> 'gawk', ... Now on GNU/Linux systems there's no need for such >> prefixing and, for consistency and to send a message, you may just >> name the C compiler with the traditional name 'cc' which means: Hey, >> this is the official system C compiler and of course, it's the GNU >> one. > > Yeah, and I see that GCC installs =E2=80=98c++=E2=80=99. > > If there=E2=80=99s consensus to install the symlink, that=E2=80=99s fine = with me (if we > take that route, I would also suggest submitting a patch upstream so GCC > installs the symlink.) > > It=E2=80=99s a rebuild-the-world change, though, so it would be for the n= ext > =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 cycle. In the meantime, it=E2=80=99s =E2= =80=98gcc=E2=80=99. > > WDYT? To me that's the way it should be on a GNU system :-) Thanks! Fede