On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> I think it’s a matter of separating concerns.  In my mind there are
> three distinct layers:
>
>   1. Cabal parsing (what I call ‘read-cabal’, because it’s the
>      equivalent of ‘read’);
>
>   2. Cabal evaluation/instantiation for a certain set of flags, OS,
>      etc. (what I call ‘eval-cabal’ because it’s the equivalent of
>      ‘eval’);
>
>   3. Conversion of Cabal packages of Guix package sexps.
>
> My concern was about making sure these three phases were clearly visible
> in the code.  Tu put it differently, #1 and #2 would conceptually be
> part of a Cabal parsing/evaluation library, while #3 would be the only
> Guix-specific part.

Please find attached a patch reorganizing the code as you suggest.

Regards,
Fede