From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Federico Beffa Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add pyparsing. Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:51:15 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87a93ftcv2.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtKGo-0008Ry-R0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:51:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtKGj-0000c9-Ak for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:51:22 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]:59228) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtKGj-0000bq-2g for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:51:17 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u10so1014167lbd.31 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:51:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87a93ftcv2.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Bavier Cc: Guix-devel Cyril Roelandt writes: > > Maybe you could add the PyPI mirror here. > I'm not sure I understand. Do you mean replace or really add? A second uri field? Could you give an example? The sourceforge download site is the one mentioned on the homepage. > > There is a "unitTests.py" that can be run manually, if I'm not mistaken. > Maybe you could replace the check phase ? > I do not think so. I do not see any reference to tests in the README and other source files and I can't find a file called "unitTests.py". > > I trust you on the doc thing :) Is it something that could somehow be > part of the python build system? > I'm not a python expert :-) From the few packages that I prepared lately, I have the impression that each python library does something different with the documentation. > > Do not start the synopsis by "a". You may want to run "guix lint" on > your package to find such issues. > Ooops, forgot to run that. Thanks for the review, Fede