From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>
Subject: Re: haskell-mode
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:50:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKrPhPNqYN1-eVco+F+V9OwZMcNgYehYZxmeRHzgosMqgPyUiQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKrPhPONkLreO=mq=P1958zD7MyQX969u4H8-NFSbEt+b=V1qA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87fv41rjd8.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52596)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1ZMAW4-000859-0U
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:50:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1ZMAW2-0007x9-VI
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:50:35 -0400
Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]:34167)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1ZMAW2-0007wt-Qh
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:50:34 -0400
Received: by igk11 with SMTP id 11so66765890igk.1
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87fv41rjd8.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> wrote:
> Federico Beffa (2015-08-01 19:18 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose to change the name of package 'haskell-mode'
>> to 'emacs-haskell-mode' as we recently started doing for emacs
>> packages.
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> I agree on this, but I don't understand the convention of naming emacs
> packages.  What about "geiser", "emms", "magit", "paredit"?  I have a
> feeling they shouldn't be renamed into "emacs-geiser", =E2=80=A6 but I ca=
n't
> explain why.

The discussion on naming was very quick:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-06/msg00309.html

>From my point of view, if we want to be consistent we should use the
same prefix for all packages providing Emacs libraries/extensions.
Choices based on feelings are just going to make things confusing.

Fede