From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Federico Beffa Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFR3byBwYWNrYWdlcyBhcmUgY2FsbGVkIOKAmHB5dGhvbi13cmFwcGVy4oCZ?= Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:09:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87vb7srbji.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9jcnkgd.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60056) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aAyKr-0003QE-Ji for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 06:09:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aAyKq-0006jV-TI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 06:09:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87h9jcnkgd.fsf_-_@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote= : > In the meantime, I would recommend using -e to unambiguously refer to > the right wrapper. Otherwise, we could come up with workarounds, such > as keeping the =E2=80=98python-minimal-wrapper=E2=80=99 private. Isn't 'python-minimal' just for bootstrapping? If that's the case, I would keep it private (but fix the name anyway). Regards, Fede