From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Federico Beffa Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] gnu: Add chez-matchable. Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:10:52 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87insr9j47.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53623) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwAV9-0004FH-0U for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:10:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwAV5-00035i-3R for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:10:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87insr9j47.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Federico Beffa skribis: > >> From 5821d3e41e37df01492141f128a0a09b5e70498f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Federico Beffa >> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 16:08:33 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH 05/15] gnu: Add chez-matchable. >> >> * gnu/packages/chez.scm (chez-matchable): New variable. > > [...] > >> +;; Help function for Chez Scheme to add the current path to >> +;; CHEZSCHEMELIBDIRS. >> +(define chez-configure >> + '(lambda _ >> + (let ((chez-env (getenv "CHEZSCHEMELIBDIRS"))) >> + (setenv "CHEZSCHEMELIBDIRS" >> + (if chez-env >> + (string-append ".:" chez-env) >> + ".")) >> + #t))) > > Would it make sense to define a chez-build-system? I don't think so: There aren't so many libraries and everybody is doing his thing. Fede