From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>
Subject: Re: reproducibility
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:51:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKrPhPNKtCeU_ypL1uf+95KDH00nBeq0znRXizGAUn3i5+rubg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKrPhPP+j6jfmLFk5WuHxa6q=fRO++KHkeOZ4kC-Mnw8ZxNcSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<874mel2m94.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPMn_gQMyRoa8b8ZV=o8rovfUPTbVNQnR=PraLWgXuYq3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<87bn8qa385.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPOLVB0O3uRCP=5-c5kYYdoRXknLO8uozy8cw==xtUeznw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160113111521.516a4a50@debian-netbook>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57632)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1aJRSZ-0001iX-L3
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:52:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1aJRSY-0003uB-GI
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:51:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20160113111521.516a4a50@debian-netbook>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> w=
rote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:13:25 +0100
> Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wr=
ote:
>>  [...]
>>  [...]
>>  [...]
>>  [...]
>>  [...]
>>  [...]
>>  [...]
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, could you provide a concrete example where the
>> order is purposefully specified.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Fede
>>
>
> I haven't had time (since reading this) to test if the order matters or n=
ot,
> but some of the openstack packages say they care about order:
> https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-keystoneclient/tree/test-=
requirements.txt?h=3D2.0.0

Reading the comment sounds like its because pip installs packages
sequentially. Sounds like a different approach from what we are doing.

Anyway, thanks for the pointer.
Regards,
Fede