From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Cython
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 22:15:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKrPhPNCdqch5qsh3tBEcOiq=X5B6Z8ZBOt=Qvt8z6kgvsJdDA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKrPhPO9AS0zgdfd+w6hL9yXNC5f32GKyX9ozjMoEds9i00qZg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141023062426.GA6636@debian>
	<CAKrPhPN4_RZ9vY3SsX3uNcn_xoFwkD4Zzot2qvf060aYKOKUPQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87fve0nrvt.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20141103170016.GA5357@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr>
	<877fzcax5q.fsf@gnu.org> <20141103195014.GA4311@debian>
	<CAKrPhPP1G45j-Xt_Z9Hef2T0ax7QJ2BC1P3sMm5STbZguRpKVg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33261)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1XlOyV-0005kx-S9
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:15:44 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <federico.beffa@gmail.com>) id 1XlOyU-0000Or-TH
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:15:43 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAKrPhPP1G45j-Xt_Z9Hef2T0ax7QJ2BC1P3sMm5STbZguRpKVg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org> wrote:
> No, Andreas is right: this patch suffers from the same problem as Numpy.

Maybe I wasn't clear :-)  the patch does include python as an input.
So, it will build in master, without any change in python-wrapper.
After the changes in python-wrapper, we may want to remove the python
input.

Regards,
Fede