* [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file.
@ 2016-05-27 14:10 David Thompson
2016-05-27 14:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-better-defaults David Thompson
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: David Thompson @ 2016-05-27 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
* guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm (gnu:unpack)
(store-file->elisp-source-file, unpack): New procedures.
(%standard-phases): Use the new unpack procedure.
---
guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm b/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm
index f0a9a6e..4fd36d1 100644
--- a/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm
+++ b/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#:use-module (guix build utils)
#:use-module (guix build emacs-utils)
#:use-module (srfi srfi-1)
+ #:use-module (srfi srfi-11)
#:use-module (srfi srfi-26)
#:use-module (ice-9 rdelim)
#:use-module (ice-9 regex)
@@ -39,6 +40,27 @@
;; archive signature.
(define %install-suffix "/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d")
+(define gnu:unpack (assoc-ref gnu:%standard-phases 'unpack))
+
+(define (store-file->elisp-source-file file)
+ "Convert file, a store file name for an Emacs Lisp source file, into a file
+name that has been stripped of the hash and version number."
+ (let-values (((name version)
+ (package-name->name+version
+ (strip-store-file-name file))))
+ (string-append name ".el")))
+
+(define* (unpack #:key source #:allow-other-keys)
+ "Unpack SOURCE into the build directory. SOURCE may be a compressed
+archive, a directory, or an Emacs Lisp file."
+ (if (string-suffix? ".el" source)
+ (begin
+ (mkdir "source")
+ (chdir "source")
+ (copy-file source (store-file->elisp-source-file source))
+ #t)
+ (gnu:unpack #:source source)))
+
(define* (build #:key outputs inputs #:allow-other-keys)
"Compile .el files."
(let* ((emacs (string-append (assoc-ref inputs "emacs") "/bin/emacs"))
@@ -151,6 +173,7 @@ second hyphen. This corresponds to 'name-version' as used in ELPA packages."
(define %standard-phases
(modify-phases gnu:%standard-phases
+ (replace 'unpack unpack)
(delete 'configure)
(delete 'check)
(delete 'install)
--
2.7.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-better-defaults.
2016-05-27 14:10 [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file David Thompson
@ 2016-05-27 14:10 ` David Thompson
2016-05-28 14:05 ` Alex Kost
2016-05-28 15:37 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-05-28 13:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file Alex Kost
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: David Thompson @ 2016-05-27 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
* gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-better-defaults): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
index 5d6db5a..105c25d 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
@@ -1706,3 +1706,24 @@ It is recommended to use @code{clojure-mode} with paredit or smartparens.")
The purpose of this library is to wrap all the quirks and hassle of
@code{package.el} into a sane API.")
(license license:gpl3+)))
+
+(define-public emacs-better-defaults
+ (package
+ (name "emacs-better-defaults")
+ (version "0.1.3")
+ (source
+ (origin
+ (method url-fetch)
+ (uri (string-append "http://stable.melpa.org/packages/better-defaults-"
+ version ".el"))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "0lvpmja8i8v10lbcvzj6pd7vn9c7gnlbcddd416g2pjq0yydydgf"))))
+ (build-system emacs-build-system)
+ (home-page "https://github.com/technomancy/better-defaults")
+ (synopsis "Better defaults for Emacs")
+ (description
+ "Better defaults attempts to address the most obvious deficiencies of the
+Emacs default configuration in uncontroversial ways that nearly everyone can
+agree upon.")
+ (license license:gpl3+)))
--
2.7.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-better-defaults.
2016-05-27 14:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-better-defaults David Thompson
@ 2016-05-28 14:05 ` Alex Kost
2016-05-28 15:37 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Alex Kost @ 2016-05-28 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Thompson; +Cc: guix-devel
David Thompson (2016-05-27 17:10 +0300) wrote:
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-better-defaults): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
> index 5d6db5a..105c25d 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
> @@ -1706,3 +1706,24 @@ It is recommended to use @code{clojure-mode} with paredit or smartparens.")
> The purpose of this library is to wrap all the quirks and hassle of
> @code{package.el} into a sane API.")
> (license license:gpl3+)))
> +
> +(define-public emacs-better-defaults
> + (package
> + (name "emacs-better-defaults")
> + (version "0.1.3")
> + (source
> + (origin
> + (method url-fetch)
> + (uri (string-append "http://stable.melpa.org/packages/better-defaults-"
> + version ".el"))
My understanding is that we prefer to retrieve a source directly from
the upstream, so it is better to use:
https://github.com/technomancy/better-defaults/archive/0.1.3.tar.gz
Otherwise, LGTM.
> + (sha256
> + (base32
> + "0lvpmja8i8v10lbcvzj6pd7vn9c7gnlbcddd416g2pjq0yydydgf"))))
> + (build-system emacs-build-system)
> + (home-page "https://github.com/technomancy/better-defaults")
> + (synopsis "Better defaults for Emacs")
> + (description
> + "Better defaults attempts to address the most obvious deficiencies of the
> +Emacs default configuration in uncontroversial ways that nearly everyone can
> +agree upon.")
> + (license license:gpl3+)))
--
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-better-defaults.
2016-05-27 14:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-better-defaults David Thompson
2016-05-28 14:05 ` Alex Kost
@ 2016-05-28 15:37 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-05-30 15:11 ` Thompson, David
1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2016-05-28 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Thompson; +Cc: guix-devel
David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> skribis:
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-better-defaults): New variable.
[...]
> + (uri (string-append "http://stable.melpa.org/packages/better-defaults-"
> + version ".el"))
IIRC, MELPA URLs are not stable over time (modified in place) and for
this reason we usually fetch things from Git instead.
Could you do that here?
Otherwise LGTM, thanks!
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-better-defaults.
2016-05-28 15:37 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2016-05-30 15:11 ` Thompson, David
2016-05-31 16:59 ` Mark H Weaver
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Thompson, David @ 2016-05-30 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> skribis:
>
>> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-better-defaults): New variable.
>
> [...]
>
>> + (uri (string-append "http://stable.melpa.org/packages/better-defaults-"
>> + version ".el"))
>
> IIRC, MELPA URLs are not stable over time (modified in place) and for
> this reason we usually fetch things from Git instead.
>
> Could you do that here?
Fixed and pushed. Thanks Ludo and Alex!
- Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-better-defaults.
2016-05-30 15:11 ` Thompson, David
@ 2016-05-31 16:59 ` Mark H Weaver
2016-05-31 17:16 ` Thompson, David
2016-05-31 20:53 ` Alex Kost
0 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Mark H Weaver @ 2016-05-31 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thompson, David; +Cc: guix-devel
"Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:
> Fixed and pushed. Thanks Ludo and Alex!
It fails to build on Hydra:
http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1208688 (x86_64)
http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1208304 (i686)
http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1208517 (armhf)
Can you take a look?
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-better-defaults.
2016-05-31 16:59 ` Mark H Weaver
@ 2016-05-31 17:16 ` Thompson, David
2016-06-01 2:07 ` Mark H Weaver
2016-05-31 20:53 ` Alex Kost
1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Thompson, David @ 2016-05-31 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark H Weaver; +Cc: guix-devel
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> wrote:
> "Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:
>> Fixed and pushed. Thanks Ludo and Alex!
>
> It fails to build on Hydra:
>
> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1208688 (x86_64)
> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1208304 (i686)
> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1208517 (armhf)
These jobs are for building emacs-constants, contributed by Federico
Beffa in February. I took a look at the build log and the failure is
in the make-autoloads build phase which this patch set shouldn't have
affected.
- Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-better-defaults.
2016-05-31 17:16 ` Thompson, David
@ 2016-06-01 2:07 ` Mark H Weaver
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Mark H Weaver @ 2016-06-01 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thompson, David; +Cc: guix-devel
"Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> wrote:
>> "Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:
>>> Fixed and pushed. Thanks Ludo and Alex!
>>
>> It fails to build on Hydra:
>>
>> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1208688 (x86_64)
>> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1208304 (i686)
>> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1208517 (armhf)
>
> These jobs are for building emacs-constants, contributed by Federico
> Beffa in February. I took a look at the build log and the failure is
> in the make-autoloads build phase which this patch set shouldn't have
> affected.
Ah, indeed, I stand corrected. Sorry for the noise.
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-better-defaults.
2016-05-31 16:59 ` Mark H Weaver
2016-05-31 17:16 ` Thompson, David
@ 2016-05-31 20:53 ` Alex Kost
2016-05-31 20:55 ` Thompson, David
1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Alex Kost @ 2016-05-31 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark H Weaver; +Cc: guix-devel
Mark H Weaver (2016-05-31 19:59 +0300) wrote:
> "Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:
>> Fixed and pushed. Thanks Ludo and Alex!
>
> It fails to build on Hydra:
>
> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1208688 (x86_64)
> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1208304 (i686)
> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1208517 (armhf)
This happened because the source was wrongfully renamed to ".el" while
it should be ".tar.gz". Fixed by commit
37dbfc50841a8e91f9fb0dc80ff9b5f23de38689.
--
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file.
2016-05-27 14:10 [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file David Thompson
2016-05-27 14:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-better-defaults David Thompson
@ 2016-05-28 13:59 ` Alex Kost
2016-05-28 15:36 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-05-30 16:27 ` Solving the ‘package-name->name+version’ name conflict. (was: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file.) Mathieu Lirzin
3 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Alex Kost @ 2016-05-28 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Thompson; +Cc: guix-devel, Federico Beffa
David Thompson (2016-05-27 17:10 +0300) wrote:
> * guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm (gnu:unpack)
> (store-file->elisp-source-file, unpack): New procedures.
> (%standard-phases): Use the new unpack procedure.
I think there is no need to improve emacs-build-system to handle single
file sources: there is 'uncompressed-file-fetch' method for this
purpose. Look in (gnu packages emacs) for this procedure and how it is
used (for example, by 'emacs-rfcview' package).
I Cc-ed Federico as he added 'uncompressed-file-fetch'.
--
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file.
2016-05-27 14:10 [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file David Thompson
2016-05-27 14:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-better-defaults David Thompson
2016-05-28 13:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file Alex Kost
@ 2016-05-28 15:36 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-05-28 19:05 ` Alex Kost
2016-05-30 16:27 ` Solving the ‘package-name->name+version’ name conflict. (was: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file.) Mathieu Lirzin
3 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2016-05-28 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Thompson; +Cc: guix-devel
David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> skribis:
> * guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm (gnu:unpack)
> (store-file->elisp-source-file, unpack): New procedures.
> (%standard-phases): Use the new unpack procedure.
Good idea, LGTM!
Could you adjust users of ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’ in a subsequent
commit, and remove ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file.
2016-05-28 15:36 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2016-05-28 19:05 ` Alex Kost
2016-05-29 21:50 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Alex Kost @ 2016-05-28 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel
Ludovic Courtès (2016-05-28 18:36 +0300) wrote:
> David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> skribis:
>
>> * guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm (gnu:unpack)
>> (store-file->elisp-source-file, unpack): New procedures.
>> (%standard-phases): Use the new unpack procedure.
>
> Good idea, LGTM!
>
> Could you adjust users of ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’ in a subsequent
> commit, and remove ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’?
I object! I mean this should be discussed at least. I would really
prefer to keep (and document) 'uncompressed-file-fetch' and not to
update emacs-build-system for this case. It is possible, that once
we'll need to handle non-compressed files for another build system. So
it should also be adjusted in the same way. But if we keep
'uncompressed-file-fetch', it will be a general decision as it can be
used for any build system.
--
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file.
2016-05-28 19:05 ` Alex Kost
@ 2016-05-29 21:50 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-05-30 10:14 ` Alex Kost
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2016-05-29 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Kost; +Cc: guix-devel
Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2016-05-28 18:36 +0300) wrote:
>
>> David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> skribis:
>>
>>> * guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm (gnu:unpack)
>>> (store-file->elisp-source-file, unpack): New procedures.
>>> (%standard-phases): Use the new unpack procedure.
>>
>> Good idea, LGTM!
>>
>> Could you adjust users of ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’ in a subsequent
>> commit, and remove ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’?
>
> I object!
Damn it, sorry, I thought this would be uncontroversial.
> I mean this should be discussed at least. I would really prefer to
> keep (and document) 'uncompressed-file-fetch' and not to update
> emacs-build-system for this case. It is possible, that once we'll
> need to handle non-compressed files for another build system. So it
> should also be adjusted in the same way. But if we keep
> 'uncompressed-file-fetch', it will be a general decision as it can be
> used for any build system.
In my view, ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’ and the ‘emacs-build-system’
change that Dave proposes are equally good hacks, but the latter has the
advantage that people won’t have to think about it: they can just use
‘url-fetch’ and ‘emacs-build-system’ as usual and things will just work.
Of course, perhaps we should consider handling flat files closer to the
core, but so far the only use case we have, AFAIK, is .el files. Thus,
it doesn’t seem that bad to add a special case in ‘emacs-build-system’.
Pragmatic approach I suppose. ;-)
WDYT?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file.
2016-05-29 21:50 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2016-05-30 10:14 ` Alex Kost
2016-05-30 11:55 ` Catonano
2016-05-30 15:12 ` Thompson, David
0 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Alex Kost @ 2016-05-30 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel
Ludovic Courtès (2016-05-30 00:50 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès (2016-05-28 18:36 +0300) wrote:
>>
>>> David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> skribis:
>>>
>>>> * guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm (gnu:unpack)
>>>> (store-file->elisp-source-file, unpack): New procedures.
>>>> (%standard-phases): Use the new unpack procedure.
>>>
>>> Good idea, LGTM!
>>>
>>> Could you adjust users of ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’ in a subsequent
>>> commit, and remove ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’?
>>
>> I object!
>
> Damn it, sorry, I thought this would be uncontroversial.
>
>> I mean this should be discussed at least. I would really prefer to
>> keep (and document) 'uncompressed-file-fetch' and not to update
>> emacs-build-system for this case. It is possible, that once we'll
>> need to handle non-compressed files for another build system. So it
>> should also be adjusted in the same way. But if we keep
>> 'uncompressed-file-fetch', it will be a general decision as it can be
>> used for any build system.
>
> In my view, ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’ and the ‘emacs-build-system’
> change that Dave proposes are equally good hacks, but the latter has the
> advantage that people won’t have to think about it: they can just use
> ‘url-fetch’ and ‘emacs-build-system’ as usual and things will just work.
>
> Of course, perhaps we should consider handling flat files closer to the
> core, but so far the only use case we have, AFAIK, is .el files. Thus,
> it doesn’t seem that bad to add a special case in ‘emacs-build-system’.
> Pragmatic approach I suppose. ;-)
>
> WDYT?
<cough>, OK, I wanted to write verbosely why I prefer
uncompressed-file-fetch, and why we should still use it, etc.;
but I've just noticed an unpleasant downside with
‘uncompressed-file-fetch’: for example, if you build the recently added
"emacs-queue" package, you'll get "queue-0.1.1.el" file, which makes it
impossible to do (require 'queue). With David's solution, it will be a
proper "queue.el" file.
So I agree now. David's patch is definitely a better solution :-)
--
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file.
2016-05-30 10:14 ` Alex Kost
@ 2016-05-30 11:55 ` Catonano
2016-05-30 12:42 ` Catonano
2016-05-30 15:12 ` Thompson, David
1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Catonano @ 2016-05-30 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Kost; +Cc: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1001 bytes --]
2016-05-30 12:14 GMT+02:00 Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>:
>
> <cough>, OK, I wanted to write verbosely why I prefer
> uncompressed-file-fetch, and why we should still use it, etc.;
>
> but I've just noticed an unpleasant downside with
> ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’: for example, if you build the recently added
> "emacs-queue" package, you'll get "queue-0.1.1.el" file, which makes it
> impossible to do (require 'queue). With David's solution, it will be a
> proper "queue.el" file.
>
> So I agree now. David's patch is definitely a better solution :-)
>
>
Ah ! This is probably why I couldn't manage emacs-cider to require
emacs-spinner and emacs-queue. They both are packaged with
uncompressed-file-fetch.
In fact queue and spinner work if I installl them on their own.
After I attempt with cider, they not only are not requirable but they are
also not autoloaded anymore.
So now I'll try stick with more tested download methods and see if cider
works with those.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1550 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file.
2016-05-30 11:55 ` Catonano
@ 2016-05-30 12:42 ` Catonano
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Catonano @ 2016-05-30 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Kost; +Cc: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1248 bytes --]
2016-05-30 13:55 GMT+02:00 Catonano <catonano@gmail.com>:
> 2016-05-30 12:14 GMT+02:00 Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>:
>
>>
>> <cough>, OK, I wanted to write verbosely why I prefer
>> uncompressed-file-fetch, and why we should still use it, etc.;
>>
>> but I've just noticed an unpleasant downside with
>> ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’: for example, if you build the recently added
>> "emacs-queue" package, you'll get "queue-0.1.1.el" file, which makes it
>> impossible to do (require 'queue). With David's solution, it will be a
>> proper "queue.el" file.
>>
>> So I agree now. David's patch is definitely a better solution :-)
>>
>>
> Ah ! This is probably why I couldn't manage emacs-cider to require
> emacs-spinner and emacs-queue. They both are packaged with
> uncompressed-file-fetch.
>
> In fact queue and spinner work if I installl them on their own.
>
> After I attempt with cider, they not only are not requirable but they are
> also not autoloaded anymore.
>
> So now I'll try stick with more tested download methods and see if cider
> works with those.
>
>
queue is available only as an uncompresse file
So I'll wait for this patch to be merged and then I'll try with the new
emacs-build-system
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2133 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file.
2016-05-30 10:14 ` Alex Kost
2016-05-30 11:55 ` Catonano
@ 2016-05-30 15:12 ` Thompson, David
1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Thompson, David @ 2016-05-30 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Kost; +Cc: guix-devel
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès (2016-05-30 00:50 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès (2016-05-28 18:36 +0300) wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> skribis:
>>>>
>>>>> * guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm (gnu:unpack)
>>>>> (store-file->elisp-source-file, unpack): New procedures.
>>>>> (%standard-phases): Use the new unpack procedure.
>>>>
>>>> Good idea, LGTM!
>>>>
>>>> Could you adjust users of ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’ in a subsequent
>>>> commit, and remove ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’?
>>>
>>> I object!
>>
>> Damn it, sorry, I thought this would be uncontroversial.
>>
>>> I mean this should be discussed at least. I would really prefer to
>>> keep (and document) 'uncompressed-file-fetch' and not to update
>>> emacs-build-system for this case. It is possible, that once we'll
>>> need to handle non-compressed files for another build system. So it
>>> should also be adjusted in the same way. But if we keep
>>> 'uncompressed-file-fetch', it will be a general decision as it can be
>>> used for any build system.
>>
>> In my view, ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’ and the ‘emacs-build-system’
>> change that Dave proposes are equally good hacks, but the latter has the
>> advantage that people won’t have to think about it: they can just use
>> ‘url-fetch’ and ‘emacs-build-system’ as usual and things will just work.
>>
>> Of course, perhaps we should consider handling flat files closer to the
>> core, but so far the only use case we have, AFAIK, is .el files. Thus,
>> it doesn’t seem that bad to add a special case in ‘emacs-build-system’.
>> Pragmatic approach I suppose. ;-)
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> <cough>, OK, I wanted to write verbosely why I prefer
> uncompressed-file-fetch, and why we should still use it, etc.;
>
> but I've just noticed an unpleasant downside with
> ‘uncompressed-file-fetch’: for example, if you build the recently added
> "emacs-queue" package, you'll get "queue-0.1.1.el" file, which makes it
> impossible to do (require 'queue). With David's solution, it will be a
> proper "queue.el" file.
>
> So I agree now. David's patch is definitely a better solution :-)
Hehe. Thanks for the discussion. Pushed!
- Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Solving the ‘package-name->name+version’ name conflict. (was: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file.)
2016-05-27 14:10 [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file David Thompson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2016-05-28 15:36 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2016-05-30 16:27 ` Mathieu Lirzin
2016-06-08 12:44 ` Solving the ‘package-name->name+version’ name conflict Ludovic Courtès
3 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Lirzin @ 2016-05-30 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel
Hi,
I am a bit late.
David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:
> * guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm (gnu:unpack)
> (store-file->elisp-source-file, unpack): New procedures.
> (%standard-phases): Use the new unpack procedure.
> ---
> guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm b/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm
> index f0a9a6e..4fd36d1 100644
> --- a/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm
> +++ b/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #:use-module (guix build utils)
> #:use-module (guix build emacs-utils)
> #:use-module (srfi srfi-1)
> + #:use-module (srfi srfi-11)
> #:use-module (srfi srfi-26)
> #:use-module (ice-9 rdelim)
> #:use-module (ice-9 regex)
> @@ -39,6 +40,27 @@
> ;; archive signature.
> (define %install-suffix "/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d")
>
> +(define gnu:unpack (assoc-ref gnu:%standard-phases 'unpack))
> +
> +(define (store-file->elisp-source-file file)
> + "Convert file, a store file name for an Emacs Lisp source file, into a file
> +name that has been stripped of the hash and version number."
> + (let-values (((name version)
> + (package-name->name+version
^^^
This is the old ‘package-name->name+version’ from (guix build utils)
which has been replaced when possible by a new one in (guix utils) using
'@' as a delimiter. While I think it was OK to use it to fix previously
written code, I don't want Guix to build upon the old one.
Time has come to resolve this ugly and confusing name conflict. The
problem is that I don't fully understand the rationale behind this
temporary solution, so I can't help much.
Ludo: Since you are the mind behind it, I think you are in the best
position to figure this out or at least explain to us “mere mortals”
what is possible and what is not. :)
--
Mathieu Lirzin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: Solving the ‘package-name->name+version’ name conflict.
2016-05-30 16:27 ` Solving the ‘package-name->name+version’ name conflict. (was: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file.) Mathieu Lirzin
@ 2016-06-08 12:44 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2016-06-08 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mathieu Lirzin; +Cc: guix-devel
Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org> skribis:
> David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:
>
>> * guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm (gnu:unpack)
>> (store-file->elisp-source-file, unpack): New procedures.
>> (%standard-phases): Use the new unpack procedure.
>> ---
>> guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm b/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm
>> index f0a9a6e..4fd36d1 100644
>> --- a/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm
>> +++ b/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>> #:use-module (guix build utils)
>> #:use-module (guix build emacs-utils)
>> #:use-module (srfi srfi-1)
>> + #:use-module (srfi srfi-11)
>> #:use-module (srfi srfi-26)
>> #:use-module (ice-9 rdelim)
>> #:use-module (ice-9 regex)
>> @@ -39,6 +40,27 @@
>> ;; archive signature.
>> (define %install-suffix "/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d")
>>
>> +(define gnu:unpack (assoc-ref gnu:%standard-phases 'unpack))
>> +
>> +(define (store-file->elisp-source-file file)
>> + "Convert file, a store file name for an Emacs Lisp source file, into a file
>> +name that has been stripped of the hash and version number."
>> + (let-values (((name version)
>> + (package-name->name+version
> ^^^
>
> This is the old ‘package-name->name+version’ from (guix build utils)
> which has been replaced when possible by a new one in (guix utils) using
> '@' as a delimiter. While I think it was OK to use it to fix previously
> written code, I don't want Guix to build upon the old one.
We kept this procedure in (guix build utils) because it’s still used.
In this case, we have “foo-1.2”, and we want to get the values “foo” and
“1.2”, so using this procedure is the right thing to do.
> Time has come to resolve this ugly and confusing name conflict. The
> problem is that I don't fully understand the rationale behind this
> temporary solution, so I can't help much.
>
> Ludo: Since you are the mind behind it, I think you are in the best
> position to figure this out or at least explain to us “mere mortals”
> what is possible and what is not. :)
Naming is one of the hardest problems in programming, you know! :-)
So we have:
(guix build utils):package-name->name+version
which expects “foo-1.2”
(guix utils):package-name->name+version
which expects “foo@1.2”
There’s no doubt we need to keep both, so what we can do is rename one
of them.
What about renaming the one in (guix utils) to
‘package-specification->name+version’?
Bonus points if you provide a patch! :-)
Thanks,
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-08 12:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-05-27 14:10 [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file David Thompson
2016-05-27 14:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add emacs-better-defaults David Thompson
2016-05-28 14:05 ` Alex Kost
2016-05-28 15:37 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-05-30 15:11 ` Thompson, David
2016-05-31 16:59 ` Mark H Weaver
2016-05-31 17:16 ` Thompson, David
2016-06-01 2:07 ` Mark H Weaver
2016-05-31 20:53 ` Alex Kost
2016-05-31 20:55 ` Thompson, David
2016-05-28 13:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file Alex Kost
2016-05-28 15:36 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-05-28 19:05 ` Alex Kost
2016-05-29 21:50 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-05-30 10:14 ` Alex Kost
2016-05-30 11:55 ` Catonano
2016-05-30 12:42 ` Catonano
2016-05-30 15:12 ` Thompson, David
2016-05-30 16:27 ` Solving the ‘package-name->name+version’ name conflict. (was: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file.) Mathieu Lirzin
2016-06-08 12:44 ` Solving the ‘package-name->name+version’ name conflict Ludovic Courtès
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).