From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thompson, David" Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IE5ldyDigJhndWl4IGdyYXBo4oCZIGNvbW1hbmQ=?= Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:54:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87io8164s0.fsf@gnu.org> <20150903203232.GA25036@debian> <878u8n1b9u.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXbWk-0004B1-48 for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:54:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXbWg-0000OU-Ti for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:54:34 -0400 Received: from mail-yk0-f180.google.com ([209.85.160.180]:33320) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXbWg-0000Nm-QB for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:54:30 -0400 Received: by ykei199 with SMTP id i199so1998771yke.0 for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:54:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878u8n1b9u.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hey! > > Andreas Enge skribis: > >> Very neat indeed! A tiny bit of nitpicking: Would it not be preferable i= f >> the arrows were reversed, from the inputs to the dependent packages? > > Dunno, maybe the graph people would choose the other direction but I > like it this way, looks more =E2=80=9Cintuitive=E2=80=9D to me. What do = people think? I prefer it the way that it is because it reflects the actual data structure. It's intuitive because I often ask "what does this software depend on?", not "what depends on this software?" - Dave