From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thompson, David" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] gnu: Add avr-binutils. Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 13:38:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1460639824-9976-1-git-send-email-dthompson2@worcester.edu> <1460639824-9976-2-git-send-email-dthompson2@worcester.edu> <87wpo0ktpz.fsf@gnu.org> <570FE252.6040400@gmail.com> <87twix3ax4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34643) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7R9Q-0008Oq-Qu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2016 13:38:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7R9J-0005r4-Pz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2016 13:38:52 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::233]:33065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7R9J-0005qr-M1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2016 13:38:45 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-x233.google.com with SMTP id h19so167827153ywc.0 for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 10:38:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87twix3ax4.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote= : > Manolis Ragkousis skribis: > >> And I would really prefer if we had a way to explicitly install >> avr-binutils. This way it will be more clear to someone only wanting to >> install this specific package. >> >> We could keep something like this >> >> (define-public avr-binutils >> (package >> (inherit (cross-binutils "avr")) >> (name "avr-binutils"))) > > I see. In that case, that=E2=80=99s a fine thing to do! > > Maybe (define-public avr-binutils (cross-binutils "avr")) is enough > though? Or is its name too wordy? The name was too wordy, IMO, and it is nice to have consistency with all the avr toolchain components prefixed with "avr-", so I've pushed a patch that simply gives (cross-binutils "avr") a new name. Thanks! - Dave