From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thompson, David" Subject: Re: [PATCH] update haunt to 0.2.1 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:03:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87a8ag3y58.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39801) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWQ2N-0004ap-4r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:03:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWQ2M-0007lz-F1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:03:07 -0500 Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]:34738) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWQ2M-0007lF-BK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:03:06 -0500 Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 35so162184175uak.1 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:03:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87a8ag3y58.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel Hey Ludo, On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Catonano skribis: > >> From 015719506600bcb674b1d47398af27c2b4f32d18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: humanitiesNerd >> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:55:12 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: haunt: Update to 0.2.1 >> >> * gnu/packages/guile.scm (haunt): Update to 0.2.1. > > Applied, thanks. :-) > >> (propagated-inputs >> - `(("guile-reader" ,guile-reader))) >> + `(("guile-reader" ,guile-reader) >> + ("guile-commonmark" ,guile-commonmark))) > > We could (should?) avoid this by augmenting the =E2=80=98wrap-haunt=E2=80= =99 phase. > > Thoughts? Agreed, but even better would be if I knew how to make upstream just do the right thing to begin with. ;) Do you know how this could be done? Thanks, - Dave