From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thompson, David" Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] gnu: Add emacs-yaml-mode. Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:44:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20160601140538.20311-1-dthompson2@worcester.edu> <20160601140538.20311-9-dthompson2@worcester.edu> <87twhagu76.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42798) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b8rGa-0005Va-G8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 11:44:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b8rGY-0006it-8p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 11:44:08 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22e]:34673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b8rGY-0006iK-2x for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 11:44:06 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id c189so119897835vkb.1 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 08:44:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87twhagu76.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel , David Thompson On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote: > David Thompson writes: >> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-yaml-mode): New variable. > > Hydra failed to build this one, because of a hash mismatch. > > http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1223022 > > Starting download of > /gnu/store/lky7x8fw5rd6h28x3xrwlqwjbyj0lss9-yaml-mode-0.0.12.el From > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yoshiki/yaml-mode/v0.0.12/yaml-mode.el... > > [...] > > Failed: output path > `/gnu/store/lky7x8fw5rd6h28x3xrwlqwjbyj0lss9-yaml-mode-0.0.12.el' > should have sha256 hash > `05zbb7l5j0jhn1z65lhy1f6yf77rd3rsf5ayvwm5a6dfkhr9zwnm', instead has > `17wq433ycli0qx4gdhgrmb392qblm6y2dwcyn38j5ja1lasfb0ax' > > Can you investigate? I updated the hash. Thanks! - Dave