From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catonano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: emacs: Handle sources that are a single elisp file. Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 13:55:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1464358215-4416-1-git-send-email-dthompson2@worcester.edu> <87lh2ujiu3.fsf@gnu.org> <8737p20zrf.fsf@gmail.com> <87y46sttxx.fsf@gnu.org> <8737oz26pe.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f96fc08470705340dee71 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48229) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7Lmy-0000J5-0P for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2016 07:55:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7Lmx-0006l1-2o for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2016 07:55:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8737oz26pe.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --001a113f96fc08470705340dee71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2016-05-30 12:14 GMT+02:00 Alex Kost : > > , OK, I wanted to write verbosely why I prefer > uncompressed-file-fetch, and why we should still use it, etc.; > > but I've just noticed an unpleasant downside with > =E2=80=98uncompressed-file-fetch=E2=80=99: for example, if you build the = recently added > "emacs-queue" package, you'll get "queue-0.1.1.el" file, which makes it > impossible to do (require 'queue). With David's solution, it will be a > proper "queue.el" file. > > So I agree now. David's patch is definitely a better solution :-) > > Ah ! This is probably why I couldn't manage emacs-cider to require emacs-spinner and emacs-queue. They both are packaged with uncompressed-file-fetch. In fact queue and spinner work if I installl them on their own. After I attempt with cider, they not only are not requirable but they are also not autoloaded anymore. So now I'll try stick with more tested download methods and see if cider works with those. --001a113f96fc08470705340dee71 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2016-05-30 12:14 GMT+02:00 Alex Kost <= ;alezost@gmail.com>:
=C2= =A0
<cough>, OK, I wanted to write verbosely why I prefer
uncompressed-file-fetch, and why we should still use it, etc.;

but I've just noticed an unpleasant downside with
=E2=80=98uncompressed-file-fetch=E2=80=99: for example, if you build the re= cently added
"emacs-queue" package, you'll get "queue-0.1.1.el" = file, which makes it
impossible to do (require 'queue).=C2=A0 With David's solution, it = will be a
proper "queue.el" file.

So I agree now.=C2=A0 David's patch is definitely a better solution :-)=


Ah ! This is probably why I couldn't manage emac= s-cider to require emacs-spinner and emacs-queue. They both are packaged wi= th uncompressed-file-fetch.

In fact queue and spinner wor= k if I installl them on their own.

After I attempt with c= ider, they not only are not requirable but they are also not autoloaded any= more.

So now I'll try stick with more tested download= methods and see if cider works with those.

--001a113f96fc08470705340dee71--