[PATCH] update haunt to 0.2.1

[PATCH] update haunt to 0.2.1

[Catonano]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 88 bytes --]

Hello guixers,

the attached patch updates Haunt to the recently released version 0.2.1

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 130 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-gnu-haunt-Update-to-0.2.1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1584 bytes --]

From 015719506600bcb674b1d47398af27c2b4f32d18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: humanitiesNerd <catonano@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:55:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: haunt: Update to 0.2.1

* gnu/packages/guile.scm (haunt): Update to 0.2.1.
---
 gnu/packages/guile.scm | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/guile.scm b/gnu/packages/guile.scm
index 00f587d..ba45a63 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/guile.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/guile.scm
@@ -938,14 +938,14 @@ Guile's foreign function interface.")
 (define-public haunt
   (package
     (name "haunt")
-    (version "0.2")
+    (version "0.2.1")
     (source (origin
               (method url-fetch)
               (uri (string-append "https://files.dthompson.us/haunt/haunt-"
                                   version ".tar.gz"))
               (sha256
                (base32
-                "1id83n8fs7jxys1d8jy70vylg8gzcvlw1y7hb41y3qxv5zi4671m"))))
+                "1fpaf1vm6s7j13fs35barjh5yajcc2rc3pi8r7278wpgp4i2vs3w"))))
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (arguments
      `(#:modules ((ice-9 match) (ice-9 ftw)
@@ -975,7 +975,8 @@ Guile's foreign function interface.")
     (inputs
      `(("guile" ,guile-2.0)))
     (propagated-inputs
-     `(("guile-reader" ,guile-reader)))
+     `(("guile-reader" ,guile-reader)
+       ("guile-commonmark" ,guile-commonmark)))
     (synopsis "Functional static site generator")
     (description "Haunt is a static site generator written in Guile
 Scheme.  Haunt features a functional build system and an extensible
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH] update haunt to 0.2.1

[Catonano]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 252 bytes --]

Leo,

2017-01-24 15:11 GMT+01:00 Catonano <catonano@gmail.com>:

> Hello guixers,
>
> the attached patch updates Haunt to the recently released version 0.2.1
>

Would you mind to take care of this one too ? This is even simpler than
Wiredtiger

Thanks

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 664 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] update haunt to 0.2.1

[Leo Famulari]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:49:34PM +0100, Catonano wrote:
> Leo,
> 
> 2017-01-24 15:11 GMT+01:00 Catonano <catonano@gmail.com>:
> 
> > Hello guixers,
> >
> > the attached patch updates Haunt to the recently released version 0.2.1
> >
> 
> Would you mind to take care of this one too ? This is even simpler than
> Wiredtiger

I didn't address this package because I don't know enough about it, and
the upstream developer is a Guix contributor.

Re: [PATCH] update haunt to 0.2.1

[Ludovic Courtès]

Catonano <catonano@gmail.com> skribis:

> From 015719506600bcb674b1d47398af27c2b4f32d18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: humanitiesNerd <catonano@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:55:12 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: haunt: Update to 0.2.1
>
> * gnu/packages/guile.scm (haunt): Update to 0.2.1.

Applied, thanks.  :-)

>      (propagated-inputs
> -     `(("guile-reader" ,guile-reader)))
> +     `(("guile-reader" ,guile-reader)
> +       ("guile-commonmark" ,guile-commonmark)))

We could (should?) avoid this by augmenting the ‘wrap-haunt’ phase.

Thoughts?

Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH] update haunt to 0.2.1

[Thompson, David]

Hey Ludo,

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> Catonano <catonano@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> From 015719506600bcb674b1d47398af27c2b4f32d18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: humanitiesNerd <catonano@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:55:12 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: haunt: Update to 0.2.1
>>
>> * gnu/packages/guile.scm (haunt): Update to 0.2.1.
>
> Applied, thanks.  :-)
>
>>      (propagated-inputs
>> -     `(("guile-reader" ,guile-reader)))
>> +     `(("guile-reader" ,guile-reader)
>> +       ("guile-commonmark" ,guile-commonmark)))
>
> We could (should?) avoid this by augmenting the ‘wrap-haunt’ phase.
>
> Thoughts?

Agreed, but even better would be if I knew how to make upstream just
do the right thing to begin with. ;)  Do you know how this could be
done?

Thanks,

- Dave

Re: [PATCH] update haunt to 0.2.1

[Ludovic Courtès]

Howdy David!

"Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu> skribis:

> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Catonano <catonano@gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> From 015719506600bcb674b1d47398af27c2b4f32d18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: humanitiesNerd <catonano@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:55:12 +0100
>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: haunt: Update to 0.2.1
>>>
>>> * gnu/packages/guile.scm (haunt): Update to 0.2.1.
>>
>> Applied, thanks.  :-)
>>
>>>      (propagated-inputs
>>> -     `(("guile-reader" ,guile-reader)))
>>> +     `(("guile-reader" ,guile-reader)
>>> +       ("guile-commonmark" ,guile-commonmark)))
>>
>> We could (should?) avoid this by augmenting the ‘wrap-haunt’ phase.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Agreed, but even better would be if I knew how to make upstream just
> do the right thing to begin with. ;)  Do you know how this could be
> done?

For Haunt’s own modules, you could set the right search path in the
‘haunt’ command itself, like the Shepherd and Guix do.

For these external dependencies, you could always use ‘search-path’ at
configure time to hard-wire their locations in ‘haunt’ as well.  (Guix
does not do that and I don’t know of any project that does, but IWBN.)

Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH] update haunt to 0.2.1

[Catonano]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 924 bytes --]

Hi David,

2017-01-25 19:03 GMT+01:00 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>:


> > Agreed, but even better would be if I knew how to make upstream just
> > do the right thing to begin with. ;)  Do you know how this could be
> > done?
>
> For Haunt’s own modules, you could set the right search path in the
> ‘haunt’ command itself, like the Shepherd and Guix do.
>
> For these external dependencies, you could always use ‘search-path’ at
> configure time to hard-wire their locations in ‘haunt’ as well.  (Guix
> does not do that and I don’t know of any project that does, but IWBN.)
>
> Ludo’.
>

is there any progress on this ?

I'd love to use both Haunt and Artanis but I'm not autonomous because of
these autotools related issues.

If you understood what Ludo suggested, would you mind to apply the
suggestions ?
I'd love to borrow the edits to use them on Artanis too.

Thanks

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1557 bytes --]