2017-01-19 23:51 GMT+01:00 Catonano <catonano@gmail.com>:

One last note

One more quick note

I pasted the wrong url for the packages with no dependencies

The right one is this
http://catonano.altervista.org/no-deps.txt

I noticed now that this list contains ALSO the broken ones. They have no dependencies, but they shold be excluded from this list

Because I screwed up the data format, the queries are not exactly immediate, they need honing :-/

I will fix this in the future

I produced a correct version of the "no-deps.txt" file

Also, a notion of "scoped" packages exists in npm

They can't be downloaded, as explained here
https://github.com/npm/registry/issues/34

These packages have the cons cell "(broken-package . nope)"

Yes, they are broken and they have the symbol "nope" nonetheless. It's conterintuitive, I know. I messed this thing up. I made the download function return "nope" when a download isn't allowed.

I marked them as broken and moved on. The subtree under these packages has NOT been explored.

I could use some help, here, by someone used the the Nodejs intricacies

I don't know what they mean with "scoped" and I don't know what this could mean exactly for the "Nodejs in Guix" mission