2017-01-19 23:51 GMT+01:00 Catonano <catonano@gmail.com>:

> One last note
>

One more quick note

>
> I pasted the wrong url for the packages with no dependencies
>
> The right one is this
> http://catonano.altervista.org/no-deps.txt
>
> I noticed now that this list contains ALSO the broken ones. They have no
> dependencies, but they shold be excluded from this list
>
> Because I screwed up the data format, the queries are not exactly
> immediate, they need honing :-/
>
> I will fix this in the future
>

I produced a correct version of the "no-deps.txt" file

Also, a notion of "scoped" packages exists in npm

They can't be downloaded, as explained here
https://github.com/npm/registry/issues/34

These packages have the cons cell "(broken-package . nope)"

Yes, they are broken and they have the symbol "nope" nonetheless. It's
conterintuitive, I know. I messed this thing up. I made the download
function return "nope" when a download isn't allowed.

I marked them as broken and moved on. The subtree under these packages has
NOT been explored.

I could use some help, here, by someone used the the Nodejs intricacies

I don't know what they mean with "scoped" and I don't know what this could
mean exactly for the "Nodejs in Guix" mission