From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catonano Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:05:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87lh0jf9fa.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87lh0ikl95.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160801222135.GA9924@solar> <877fbzh8ya.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <878twfzcnb.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11394658716f3a0539165f6d Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42463) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUZO8-0003CK-3e for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 09:05:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUZO5-0007OM-SN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 09:05:39 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c]:33308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUZO5-0007OI-Mo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 09:05:37 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 38so211849003iol.0 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 06:05:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878twfzcnb.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel --001a11394658716f3a0539165f6d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2016-08-02 12:30 GMT+02:00 ng0 : > > Development is a bad example, but for the current state, not considering > "0.10.2 will be out soon", the existence of -svn on a system was more > than just for development. > In fact, for what it matters, I'd like to be able to play with Gnunet. Installing a development version on my own is too difficult for me, having it in Guix would be a boon > When you read the old threads you can see that release > tarballs are just svn revisions with no additional changes. > > With this recent change, maybe out-of-tree is a better place. > Which recent change ? What does "out-of-tree" exactly mean ? > > Fyi, I tried with most recent head and tests no longer fail it seems. > This is one more reason to provide a package from a checkout. --001a11394658716f3a0539165f6d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2016-08-02 12:30 GMT+02:00 ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>= ;:

Development is a bad example, but for the current state, not co= nsidering
"0.10.2 will be out soon", the existence of -svn on a system was = more
than just for development.

In fact, for what it matters, I'd like to be able to play with Gnun= et.

Installing a development version on my own is too difficul= t for me, having it in Guix would be a boon

=C2=A0
When you read the old threads you can see that release
tarballs are just svn revisions with no additional changes.

With this recent change, maybe out-of-tree is a better place.

Which recent change ? What does "out-of-tree&qu= ot; exactly mean ?
=C2=A0

Fyi, I tried with most recent head and tests no longer fail it seems.

This is one more reason to provide a package= from a checkout.





--001a11394658716f3a0539165f6d--