From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catonano Subject: Re: gnu-patches back log Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 18:37:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20170226111029.GA19050@mail.thebird.nl> <87poi4rd1m.fsf@dustycloud.org> <20170228062531.GA647@mail.thebird.nl> <20170301061625.GA11982@jasmine> <20170301081739.GA10117@mail.thebird.nl> <20170301111715.GA11182@mail.thebird.nl> <20170301131448.GA13356@jasmine> <20170301144551.GA12261@mail.thebird.nl> <20170301155114.GA18568@jasmine> <20170301160745.GA12744@mail.thebird.nl> <87shmp2sq9.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1b45dc73009a054aa02be9 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cnTuo-00057g-Dj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:37:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cnTun-0004uP-98 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:37:50 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22c]:35640) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cnTum-0004uC-WA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:37:49 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id g10so108605727wrg.2 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:37:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87shmp2sq9.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel --94eb2c1b45dc73009a054aa02be9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2017-03-07 13:09 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus : > > Catonano writes: > > > Wrapping up, I think 2 interesting ideas popped up in this thread > > > > One is the automation of building of new packages patches > > I wouldn=E2=80=99t know how to set this up. Hydra isn=E2=80=99t powerful= enough for our > *current* purposes, so I wouldn=E2=80=99t want to increase the load at th= is > point. > Ok :-) > > > Another one is the weekly report about pending patches and merged > >patches > > I=E2=80=99d rather not have a weekly report (I get enough email through t= he > various Guix mailing lists already). The debbugs interface shows all > open patches already. (We should get more people to use guix-patches > instead of guix-devel, though.) > Ok ! This is also what Ludo is proposing > > Other than that I=E2=80=99d like to second everything Leo has written. > Sure ! I didn't mean to put off anyone's work ! If that was your impression I apologize, I gave the wrong impression ! I agree with Pjotr that obviously it would be nice to have faster/more > reviews/mentoring. That=E2=80=99s something everybody can help with, eve= n if it > is just a matter of reviewing licenses or trying to build or run the > package. But this all falls apart under stress (speaking from > experience here), so it=E2=80=99s best not to force it. > I reviewed one patch only so far, so I take your word for it I am gearing up with a viable email service and soon I'll be able to use the Emacs-Debbugs thing to its full potential ;-) --94eb2c1b45dc73009a054aa02be9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2017-03-07 13:09 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>= :

Catonano <catonano@gmail.com&g= t; writes:

> Wrapping up, I think 2 interesting ideas popped up in this thread
>
> One is the automation of building of new packages patches

I wouldn=E2=80=99t know how to set this up.=C2=A0 Hydra isn=E2=80=99= t powerful enough for our
*current* purposes, so I wouldn=E2=80=99t want to increase the load at this=
point.

Ok :-)
=C2=A0

> Another one is the weekly report about pending patches and merged
>patches

I=E2=80=99d rather not have a weekly report (I get enough email thro= ugh the
various Guix mailing lists already).=C2=A0 The debbugs interface shows all<= br> open patches already.=C2=A0 (We should get more people to use guix-patches<= br> instead of guix-devel, though.)

Ok ! Th= is is also what Ludo is proposing
=C2=A0

Other than that I=E2=80=99d like to second everything Leo has written.
<= /blockquote>

Sure ! I didn't mean to put off anyone&= #39;s work !

If that was your= impression I apologize, I gave the wrong impression !

I agree with Pjotr that obviously it would be nice to have faster/more
reviews/mentoring.=C2=A0 That=E2=80=99s something everybody can help with, = even if it
is just a matter of reviewing licenses or trying to build or run the
package.=C2=A0 But this all falls apart under stress (speaking from
experience here), so it=E2=80=99s best not to force it.

I reviewed one patch only so far, so I take your word for = it

I am gearing up with= a viable email service and soon I'll be able to use the Emacs-Debbugs = thing to its full potential ;-)
--94eb2c1b45dc73009a054aa02be9--