From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id ONXNFTl1bF8cDwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:30:17 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id SIilETl1bF/MKAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:30:17 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0BA194050F for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49308 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLOVs-000160-DD for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 06:30:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLOVa-00014O-Cj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 06:29:50 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]:43549) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLOVY-00065Q-BL; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 06:29:50 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id g3so2477895qtq.10; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:29:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TNyhx+5DZ5zJqiM6esgEuc3hx5nPwmo8ereolPij8n8=; b=m52aoRRyhtGyg9OmLgZR2qnW4mnvRDVTeQXwr/4lkEJXjA0RsgjK2dPAmbMyW2i+Zq wq37kNKCUg+5amZbLzVuEYnqi7PKQMGgrV/0dnEt+WG5fFi0Ngq9qMUzyk4GH6kwpbob wvjhVJIeaL3I6N1EsqarKRp8DxF9B23K8z2smFkdNbJ0yRn5YWZBuw5mjphpR4ALYRUk +5x+AlDlAm00FkNaZ0MBtH7Q/vj2S+djcDFqxBhy4uatGgqUX+F8T0O/MCakT1T4u6Bm EtByARD+msUZ2MW6eePSw2BfOYphqLZ8Y6YwX0+zuCvlhn/1FH+NGrPqpF34EJF8h/kW IJqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TNyhx+5DZ5zJqiM6esgEuc3hx5nPwmo8ereolPij8n8=; b=FhdRbbVI0WgJZklNwtr47m9Bed2bJzz2HQuHg9kIbr0cfCbJVD+smaowJMDVjCo//G Sq2ozXzSl8dlXEPOwEY8cRo9Y+Q0rd4eAfNiFmbJ2btuZJFuYRQRDXAfAwCxQLF+OJ/n opPybI19D8LNohgffccrmDmVo8ehOCU6uxeGeTWRDl/2/26cUVKxC3GWiKLKBnqud/Gg CkTceHKQb2wvKN9RDEuSJreGEyt7jsu8Y/chh1Mfb38nCeTc+HChWuh8BGUtx9x38qSr M24l5Hqm+ZNO8NeE7415JbrK0B0Q+ngTJFThfieH1qAVodCCxWdb6Ct+wr2mB2ljwrr3 mSdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533MLnMS+SK+06Yz2MPzXE/DVBaGVliuhhVuE+2bGBbiR5aqQWwj 9xTfK9AjGlFDkOR2rVZSDyRtXd4fVRP3pjPQ7nkdXBk2wEI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxP/1h3BxR5cHclYu4VPXpBSyuzyn/N2iXJZXfHhvYL8D1T2EptYoSo/zxzZONf1SmSHkANgTFYSQY5gfHWwu4= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:424a:: with SMTP id r10mr4439219qtm.211.1600943385472; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:29:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87k0wj7hw1.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87k0wj7hw1.fsf@gnu.org> From: zimoun Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:29:33 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cuirass: "lint -c archival"? To: Mathieu Othacehe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::836; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt1-x836.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=m52aoRRy; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.09 X-TUID: C+IRo6OPHJxI Hi, On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 09:28, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > > The idea behind is then to ask SWH folks to increase the rate limit > > for a specific IP (or couple of IPs). Today, the SWH rate is 10 save > > requests per hour, i.e., 240 per day (more or less). And the new > > chart [1] shows that there are ~2000 builds per day. Ouch! :-) > > Yesterday almost 18.000 derivations were added, and even if only 10.000 > were built, it is indeed quite substantial. That's good news. :-) On average, it is ~2000, right? Well, we could set a limit for the extra days, sending the X first buildings where X is in agreement with SWH. It would be far from perfect and some packages would not be saved, but it seems better than the current situation (depends on the submitter/reviewer only). This would be something in the meantime; while waiting the SWH sources.json loads accepts more than 'url-fetch' sources. > > If it is not possible, then instead does it make sense to add a script > > to etc/? If SWH accepts to increase the rate for a specific machine, > > the script (fold-packages+save-origin) could run with some delay and > > save all the missing Git references. > > Adding some sort of "post build" hook to Cuirass that would trigger an > SHW archival would be possible, even though it would require to > implement this mechanism. Cool! Yakafonkon. ;-) > Having a cron job archiving missing references would also be possible I > guess, but I may have a preference for the first option. Because I am lazy, the "post build" hook appears to me more complicated to implement than a cron job with a Scheme script (that I almost already have :-)). Hey, "Now is better than never. Although never is often better than *right* now." :-) Thanks, simon