From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2BV8CbfNsl7eEAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 May 2020 14:46:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 4JOiOcLNsl6PNwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 May 2020 14:46:26 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C64F0940E99 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 14:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59796 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWLJZ-0007Ea-At for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 10:46:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWLJQ-0007ET-5h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 10:46:16 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2a]:36786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWLJP-0005Zd-BT; Wed, 06 May 2020 10:46:15 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com with SMTP id dn1so834193qvb.3; Wed, 06 May 2020 07:46:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MrN1Q+d+VE33xNa65EoYcxV5nDkgVV0cp9rQBn11gGU=; b=WoJhtb+T+HC9n5o9H4IYPmefJT59HtQhKqQNbiMAmQRjopIunzgwbEVSlSW3y6gyoL otP6P15CROqvMp98PxoPhlQZoi3JaWaqrkR028zTqnmrrf59gOemQesAAAIKeY0lUz6V WzF3pyjZNkraSCAoFSl9mJVMxd1HcsrT4gBzfz7F/BHP4Vp2GRlb/09N9r/OgbpySFHZ qD4MH9o9KTb73HzObaYLvSkBvi0xUyTAh/47j694SLuPqlP9iVZ4AkJouuDwQfoVnESH GlXlEt+B+chzVQyQn5jefhrhbmrYbrX/29TnB4ZYIf3EeiMibA40WebsAPI0tsxenP3b HkFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MrN1Q+d+VE33xNa65EoYcxV5nDkgVV0cp9rQBn11gGU=; b=I0gXHijA24Mxc5MG+kjsLIss+jnpuotNKVhfy9fZRFl4Z7yfr0B3vaIa92omtnmefq UhZZD+1nQK8pyvzX95bTGeuBArKOc0j2/2vfbgvXqoZG30xs/oy2mF8fP79gUo/eZY2F ORNXo98owmmPb74t2hNaUJaZmWr49a7D2n4C9dnoYHG+hb+r6t6Qd7V2iKZGsosgHgHH H2RM4dXXOogPfilgFuqlVOZU6EvHNqXL2Jz5b2APPDML7xeFx8eMbnT9ACqZpSJj+i7T nCJzSKeHn5fiK0dCJeXm/ltN2g5cNYws7YMyI4fzasTLykElCow+ZZWWu026XeK+EaIA YLuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaVv5W4HU14a7fb4KwgWI/833GxAWSycm+TzxAOaRji2tfJNF7X cAk6Pr8NdpLcMPnyjH7govg4+fVVhXNhLqHMjRWs0Hf/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLlcKeYIu2crT7XYtCP9qXWe/WP00T7pykSfkBh9d5WBtQ+Mp/pNGLTV8y396+Vkbg+CDE1TSR4KlXlD2p5+mk= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4c92:: with SMTP id bs18mr8424014qvb.67.1588776373748; Wed, 06 May 2020 07:46:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87k11pgn2b.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87k11pgn2b.fsf@gnu.org> From: zimoun Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 16:46:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: https://guix.gnu.org/packages ? To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2a; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 0.29 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=WoJhtb+T; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [0.29 / 13.00]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.49641720150174]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail,gmail.com:server fail]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.12), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.50)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; URL_IN_SUBJECT(1.00)[guix.gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[gnu.org:email]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[zimontoutoune@gmail.com,guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:from]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: 8T+iKsHnhnsF On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 16:23, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > Does it make sense to replace the interface of [1] by the interface by = [2]? > > A goal for [1] was to have a JS-free interface. It=E2=80=99s necessarily > limiting (no search interface), but I think it=E2=80=99s good to have. I understand. Even if I am almost sure no one use it in practise. )-: Try to reach the package 'git' for example. Click 'G'. Nothing so to go to page 2. Nothing so to go to page 3. Nothing so to go to page 4. Nothing so to go to page 5. Nothing so to go to page 6. Nothing so to go to page 7. Yahoga! Find it!! :-) And it is really hard to guess the page number because it really depends on the number of packages before. In this case, the Haskell packages 'ghc-*'. A more "usable" option should to turn off the page system. Or least to be able to optionally turn it off. Then 'C-f' (or whatever you shortcut is). Or maybe I miss something on the webpage. Could happen since I am testing the Next browser. ;-) > It would also be nice to preserve the design and layout that sirgazil > came up with. Or use the nice layout with the other interface (search etc.) :-) But I understand that the JS is the current issue. Thank you for the clarification. Cheers, simon