From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
To: Josh Marshall <joshua.r.marshall.1991@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Should guix track package aliases?
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 11:57:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ3EQWA8aT2Nte-GHKbDfdX2RotmQZgt-ipaNJFP+ma=7w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFkJGReHu-NTVkFSvQnzG-YOkJa8J+x5KdOxQZkKe1uej4QVnw@mail.gmail.com>
Dear,
On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 22:19, Josh Marshall
<joshua.r.marshall.1991@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...] naming conventions between the source project, [...] , and guix itself have some drift.
Some packages already track upstream name: see the field '(proprieties
(upstream-name . "foo"))', e.g., the package "r-flowsom",
> The approach which I think makes the most sense is to add an optional but encouraged field in package definitions which takes a list of alternative package names. When using `guix search` this field could also be evaluated, and when `guix package -i` is invoked and the target does not exist, these aliases could be searched through for similar names to the non-existing target and suggest the actual package they might have intended.
Well, the 'proprieties' field is not used by 'package->recutils' which
is the function used by "guix show" (and "guix search"). I do not
have an option if an extra field "upstream-name" should be added or
not.
However, from my point of view, "Explicit is better than implicit." as
said any good Zen. ;-)
So, I appears to me a bad idea to implicitly install 'bar' when I type
"guix package -i foo" because 'bar' is an alternative name I am not
aware of.
IMHO, the fix is to improve the synposis and the description to be
able to reach the expected package. If the description is
well-written, then "guix search bar" should return the package "foo".
Well, do you have specific example in mind?
All the best,
simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-10 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-09 20:18 Should guix track package aliases? Josh Marshall
2020-05-10 9:10 ` Nikita Gillmann
2020-05-10 9:57 ` zimoun [this message]
2020-05-10 12:13 ` Julien Lepiller
2020-05-10 13:33 ` zimoun
2020-05-10 18:16 ` Josh Marshall
2020-05-24 19:25 ` Josh Marshall
2020-05-25 10:41 ` zimoun
2020-05-25 11:57 ` Josh Marshall
2020-05-25 12:04 ` Nicolò Balzarotti
2020-05-25 14:20 ` Josh Marshall
2020-05-25 21:57 ` Vincent Legoll
2020-05-25 22:30 ` Josh Marshall
2020-05-25 23:14 ` zimoun
2020-05-25 23:19 ` Josh Marshall
2020-05-10 10:08 ` Vincent Legoll
2020-05-10 12:53 ` zimoun
2020-05-28 16:27 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJ3okZ3EQWA8aT2Nte-GHKbDfdX2RotmQZgt-ipaNJFP+ma=7w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=joshua.r.marshall.1991@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).