From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Subject: bug#38529: Make --ad-hoc the default for guix environment proposed
 deprecation mechanism
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:03:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ32Ozgky=qUtj+QwjNRoX6aTzWKrMXy0M0wZpLAZRi8pg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87eexeu8mo.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ3WnG87m=jQw08M9ER+=9FS0NVx=uALHK_-4LuD50KhvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE4v=phY+7CTKMf8Y3a9p4okfqtMGOWu9kd2Nu6oCJW8OsK3Lw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ3okZ3+-yAfRpYDHz-jYONguOPWjff0iWZ_7NPEz6x5mbOO1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE4v=piMnBhHWpbB60qMRnnDNwqkuddfNv7cEihr9+5-52k2OA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ3okZ3gJDdDKWERLANp+7ueSirEZ7hH=YKa3nhCAzCzAz1TGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE4v=pgevGwP6+jSY-+0DPdtvK60sEvd-uibqhRawuo6N1pL-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <87k16vdise.fsf@gnu.org> <e992ac46-37b9-ba12-83cc-6694427acd31@fastmail.net>
 <CAJ3okZ0Fw=02cDwdn5GuiDCyUNOUY=YaGyrFyHE5qWsOQTLASQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <m1pngmrmst.fsf@khs-macbook.home>
 <CAJ3okZ3zSS0Rbnu5eLhpYHPvSY1emaj=-estQcjRwiJ3=4RMMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <m1fthfz1db.fsf@ordinateur-de-catherine--konrad.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38529.B38529.15768434043898@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <m1fthfz1db.fsf@ordinateur-de-catherine--konrad.home>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, 38529@debbugs.gnu.org
List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org

Hi Konrad,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 12:24, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net> wrote:

> The problem is scripts circulating in public repositories, tutorials,
> etc. New users will find them and use them for inspiration. It's very
> discouraging to see examples from tutorials fail or do something weird.

As I said, I am not convinced because it lacks concrete examples.
Personally, I do not know Guix ressource outside the Guix ecosystem.


> The main precedent is the Python 2->3 transition. There are tons of
> GitHub repositories with Python code but no indication if it's 2, 3, or
> both. I even had to use one that executed with either 2 or 3, but gave
> different results. It takes a lot of motivation to persist.

Except that "guix environment" will raise warnings.
Whatever.


> For guix, there's the additional issue that we use the reproducibility
> of builds as an argument. Non-reproducible examples are then a bit of a
> credibility problem.

I agree.
I do not want to fight about "backward compatibility".


As I said, talking about "guix environment", my opinion is that the
cost of the change is low.
However, we cannot know this cost, only probe and estimate: using my
probings, I estimate the cost is low.

IMHO, in this case, there is 2 ways to make a decision:
 - more probings to estimate more precisely;
or
 - say: "no backward compatibility breakage"

I am fine with both. :-)
 - I report my use-case: no cost at all
 - I propose the name "guix shell"


However, I feel I have spent enough time and energy on this topic and
I feel a blocking situation so I will move forward to another topic.
:-)

All the best,
simon