From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 8Lz8I1OQtl+UawAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:33:39 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 0E3bH1OQtl8oRgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:33:39 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58732940484 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43232 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kflwI-0004P6-CD for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:33:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kflw5-0004OD-2c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:33:25 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]:43091) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kflw3-00076v-81 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:33:24 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id u4so5675638qkk.10 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:33:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MdKXZT6QRwuYi4PxgCVxF0P1SsCBv35hS3rzsxQqK/Q=; b=nDKsHO2qesQh/EeahYHTvcOKnmX9C0SEa2w6Fy9U0ybn6d3NQflkBhV8WKRGV0p4pd ZVNxayO5Ba9RqqBnfAyO09M+hXbh0bLIBYSpyq4j0mMQV3ADGu2Vmq6rFrSM87Vxv9bN 4SXvaX0vx17L+W7iN6x+Cre0M6IgHz1hTRZHbugb6p3Pua2t4nj4+6izieU2KdBxr7wq UOkNUemKb3BADH3EVlNdUpdTtIiPdwmTDynDdYolrbtQkThg8QqXrb0br4oagyg7pACY OA+rgRN3PbyDBCzWDEDH4DQ8i9wVPksa1088L6+adfMnx1a1dw9Ddw1BnBBQzEY4C8aj +kFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MdKXZT6QRwuYi4PxgCVxF0P1SsCBv35hS3rzsxQqK/Q=; b=Px8SWziA2s3CsemupZEsAuTMrVvipc3rRgGEZfuUmFx2ZcJ3nauf5fdNzgqXBKz6Yg dyKPwzHs92p1Qj24Pynm0q9icLGq1lSUlVUdBtq436RkvIClxvAjsMyd4UOP0nLFHEzJ 4wLd4ZJdLA6379cqTWVPHgzVURaQMH2qkhpFBx3EnFvSi/ojTBV7DdCwcZDGq7DFhR1J 7FT2ISSsdNGjCKYVLXkeVWFaguiKul9ii+Gjns0F1ZinFeqDSqvb7Hzo9rKH09BJ/DHo 8YQb9i1QYzdgUEg86sBZVWu8w5hW9G3VLdM0OYpwIH0W+ybmkFgMvs0j/xKc0OxNEwc/ rpiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pd5rQv6hqU6pvfXPlCGNSIDnNTm9kpkbTvKy2/6fQLVjaFuEz nH1fvxHX9FBSjkCk5/FYDTwjo0oddso+M3MqIcwDNbwN X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx18K+vjEIpG7yrIaRAMF/AV0d3H6JqqbA0/upcVY50uSqU7Uozg/IEzDwDc4+TH0bswHnAjIF1upycScoX7Ss= X-Received: by 2002:a37:946:: with SMTP id 67mr10642971qkj.304.1605800002142; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:33:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201119135634.GE2306@E5400> <20201119141832.GF2306@E5400> <20201119143212.GG2306@E5400> In-Reply-To: <20201119143212.GG2306@E5400> From: zimoun Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:33:10 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: guix depends on openldap? To: Efraim Flashner Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x72a.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=nDKsHO2q; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.71 X-TUID: abC6HEnFiWir Hi, On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 15:32, Efraim Flashner wrote: > > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > > > > $ guix graph -t bag --path guix openldap > > > > guix@1.1.0-29.4e3ed9b > > > > guile-ssh@0.13.1 > > > > libssh@0.9.5 > > > > cmake-minimal@3.16.5 > > > > curl@7.69.1 > > > > openldap@2.4.49 > > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > > > > > > > Why does curl need an "Implementation of the Lightweight Directory > > > > Access Protocol"? > > > > > > I think a better question is can cmake-minimal depend on a new > > > curl-minimal, or does it even need curl at all? > > > > Looks like I was wrong, there is a curl-minimal afterall > > > > guix size cmake-bootstrap 199.1 MiB > > guix size cmake-minimal > > with curl-minimal 198.7 MiB > > guix size cmake-minimal 214.9 MiB > > HOWEVER, anything else that also depends on curl could depend on curl > and on curl-minimal, which would be worse than what we have now. So I'd > leave cmake-minimal with curl and remove the extra bits outlined below. I am still confused. Why cmake-minimal needs all the protocols that curl supports? What I was expecting is that cmake-minimal depends on curl-minimal and that both packages are minimal. :-) Because all in all, we end with a chubby Guix; which matters when packing it (Docker or system). All the best, simon