From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zimoun Subject: Re: (python) ctypes.util.find_library full path ? Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:02:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20190224200233.1c029e22@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47074) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyGqT-0003Qc-NG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:03:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyGqG-0006zM-1Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:02:55 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]:38593) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyGqF-0006x6-IJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:02:47 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id s1so10533574qte.5 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 06:02:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20190224200233.1c029e22@scratchpost.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: Guix Devel Hi Danny, Thank you for your explanations. On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 at 20:02, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > > In this case, since python-cairocffi is presumably also used by others, > set it up to do (1). But I checked guix master, the package > "python-cairocffi" there is already set up for (1). > > Are you sure you didn't accidentially create a duplicate that doesn't? Yes, there is a duplicate here. I naively thought that `guix import pypi -r tool` was checking if the dependency was or not already declared. The good point is I have learned about the issue and how to fix it. :-) > Are you sure that the culprit isn't in python-cairosvg ? Now, the culprit is python-cffi with a similar error than the previous one. Well, I post-pone that to come back later with fresh eyes. ;-) Thank you again for your explanations. All the best -- simon