From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id MDELB+DGn19PWQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 08:44:16 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id AHPGAuDGn19JVAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 08:44:16 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D88209402B0 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 08:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39220 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZVRm-0001b3-M0 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 03:44:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60678) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZVRd-0001aj-2Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 03:44:05 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]:34929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZVRb-0007Wi-Gq; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 03:44:04 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id 140so10882192qko.2; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:44:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D1pRMa1AxSBzkwPAxta/Da9oqeRn+518tiGsJI9JL2M=; b=KXuBZDAADrrVcFgkfZe4BfFH3U/cEcyarxY0JXwgDBddJH7bF09gMHEWBuaWh0D8kG EGkW6ftP1rJ0Qo5bpbVohdSPU/5mDzofrEdDPRhW4ZdfT8AOe0rqYe0tRPBRIgSP6Mhn FRQapJvrs2pbYiVBIZq35F8eniAlNCi4d1KIrW1CD/ktOK3WRYYEmPtPkdY+4yPFIKhl ogDEt+r3GY7CuaCGjGEL0zMBVGkwyhy4LOlVVV1EjqiAm7EKhmYRAVz3I1ycbyiflcsE 5Y6gi7Qrs7tNyleuMegN0jFDJyQKcSGOCVi8GfYtDTifXWrqW5RAcKuRd4DmbwPdKUEx dZHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D1pRMa1AxSBzkwPAxta/Da9oqeRn+518tiGsJI9JL2M=; b=QssZ9Q8upCg2Dkp4eCIaEVfKMlvGcxcnmOtYruWc7zCWhoXRpzuHdksXCr+B3DSOWe u2h6MZjCPOqrUV+Co1nZNKB/1MFh21ZgCn5BOJgoL5YlVt2xrmqSuWKM3RuH56wLeVAt H6qQfgMvREyNF09qfeMJ4AFwhoMbZhHsGqKVL0eya4ALphAVXnAhgCK1Y/LmGvlsSDs4 gWr8Xof68POWCvIrXLQ69c1El+MIKHhgYYkSslrK8rRoTMVh2Fq8i4ysz6XdM1SFdNMY zpKX7WCMpRRyKaTkNImetAaHTvMCT574aiQQdo4Q3+JZ+gs+kWE8RBop7qtRd0lAhwqf pNPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533sQCIpnf2VMuaJkENeb7lu0AfG0YUWwMvMaQfOffOmJkWxtmVa r8CrW4qfYcxtCs5KYnxXaI1xthtXmAWHKu4/1tn4cAt/kds= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHpIWi3DA42t+30sopW2fvyDgZJoz9X1u6q/1rUvguPw0uN8Cnao/Ys0CMSoXovMpxl3l14O+5/WAIokgxkXg= X-Received: by 2002:a37:814:: with SMTP id 20mr7822839qki.304.1604306641607; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:44:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <863630u6ap.fsf@gmail.com> <87zh4f4ukl.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnzj1shv.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0v7yv4l.fsf@gmail.com> <87zh42qbco.fsf_-_@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87zh42qbco.fsf_-_@gnu.org> From: zimoun Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 09:43:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Branching for v1.2? To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x72d.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?UTF-8?B?SmFrdWIgS8SFZHppb8WCa2E=?= , Guix Devel , Maxim Cournoyer , Mathieu Othacehe Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=KXuBZDAA; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.59 X-TUID: S1tITd3MOgYH Hi, On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 at 23:28, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Having pushed the (guix transformations) patch=C2=B9, which also updates = the > manual and thus requires yet some more translation work, I think I don=E2= =80=99t > have any serious changes to make and I=E2=80=99d be happy to branch now. = WDYT? I think it would be good to branch. > There are a couple of pending issues, notably regarding locales in GRUB, > but nothing big hopefully, and nothing that changes the manual and > strings I believe. Does it break the system? Miguel seems to say no. Does it downgrade the first impression that the user has? > Tuesday 6th is approaching very fast and probably we=E2=80=99re be a bit = behind > schedule, we=E2=80=99ll see. I think this Fri. Nov. 6th will be hard; but it is still doable if we branch really soon. Tomorrow? All the best, simon