From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zimoun Subject: Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ? Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:42:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87a7lb5rza.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gX2ur-000249-4x for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:43:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gX2uq-00079B-Di for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:43:01 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::436]:41998) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gX2uq-00077Q-46 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:43:00 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id q18so17348829wrx.9 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:43:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87a7lb5rza.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Guix Devel Thank you the explanations. > New Bioconductor packages should go to bioconductor.scm. Eventually we > may move all remaining R packages from bioinformatics to > bioconductor.scm. I am a bit confused. The file bioconductor.scm contains (or will contain) all R packages from Bioconductor, right? But R packages from CRAN used in Bioinformatics ? bioconductor.scm or bioinformatics.scm? And I am asking myself if a massive import from Bioconductor should be possible ?