From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zimoun Subject: Re: Package file indexing Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:59:25 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20190314204941.GA21065@jasmine.lan> <87mulx9kuv.fsf@nckx> <87zhpx846u.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87bm21y2s2.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87imw7cpe7.fsf@bababa.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87pnqdhkpf.fsf@gnu.org> <87imlt3hr2.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <462f35f7596f7318d2b34cc300a7e27a69d2072c.camel@riseup.net> <87pnfs9437.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <875zhk90pa.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zhew7i7t.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ipb9m-0000YP-RY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 11:59:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ipb9l-0008JL-JG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 11:59:38 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2e]:46025) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ipb9l-0008H2-12 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 11:59:37 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com with SMTP id l14so3236800qvu.12 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 08:59:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87zhew7i7t.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: Guix-devel On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 16:38, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > I am looking for the file gmsh.h and I do not know nothing more. > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > guix search /gmsh.h > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > would work. You don't need the full path. I do not like because it is not meaningful. It appears to me more confusing than the rare case of "file:file:". ;-) > >> >> - guix search file:ieee*.sty bin/gmsh latex > > > > I know nothing about the path of the file ieee*.sty and it does not > > belong to the package gmsh. > > I don't understand what you are trying to search. Is it the 'bin/gmsh' > file or the files matching 'ieee*.sty'? In this (virtual and non-sensical) example, I am looking for packages that contains any file matching ieee*.sty *and* any file matching "bin/gmsh" *and* any package that matches latex in its name/synopsis/description. I do not see why the both syntax can live together. To me, sometimes "file:" is clearer, sometimes instead "/" is. All the best, simon