From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zimoun Subject: Re: Packaging Jami progress Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:43:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20191104214754.793ec2ff@interia.pl> <20191105175001.389c6117@interia.pl> <87pni5qouc.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191106172445.3bdd057d@interia.pl> <87r22lorwh.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <877e4bo646.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191107204757.23dd08de@interia.pl> <874kzfo21r.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191108192542.5daa7a0a@interia.pl> <87zhh2kdt2.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191111111423.66ec31d5@interia.pl> <87r22ek7x4.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <874kzajvy9.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191111163843.0629ef41@kompiuter> <87o8xe4d5m.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87eeya49hf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191114214010.7b61005f@kompiuter> <87lfsikttk.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191114231605.0ecec870@kompiuter> <87a797o6hb.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191125221517.1140d0c9@kompiuter> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iZdw6-0005Mg-Ly for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 11:43:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZdw5-00051W-DL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 11:43:34 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]:42141) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZdw5-00051D-5n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 11:43:33 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id g19so1892946qtv.9 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:43:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20191125221517.1140d0c9@kompiuter> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Cc: Guix-devel Hi, Thank you for working that. On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 at 22:15, Jan wrote: > Sorry for being impatient, but is it normal for patches to be merged > that long? Is there something stopping the commits? > I need those merged in order to continue working on Jami. Two weeks are not that long. ;-) If you feel frustrating -- and I understand, I feel time to time the same :-) -- my advice is to help to decrease the stack by reviewing (building, testing, asking the status) of old patches [1] and/or by trying to close old bugs [2]. [1] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=0;max-bugs=100;base-order=1;package=guix-patches;bug-rev=1;ordering=normal;archive=0;page=4 [2] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=guix;max-bugs=100;archive=0;ordering=normal;base-order=1;repeatmerged=0;bug-rev=1;page=9 Why do you need these merged in master to continue working on Jami? In any case, the patch "[PATCH 2/9] gnu: Add sobjectizer." does not seem to apply because the commit 7e08be71ac39f (pushed the day after Pierre submitted the series :-)) Pierre, could you advice me with your Magit' power to easily apply and test the series? Or the only way is to rebase against the parent commit of the Mathieu's commit? Cheers, simon