From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: best practise between git-fetch vs url-fetch?
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 03:08:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ0v3VvmT=eWAVeAQoFqZh4L3H4tUkEJn1-5EXcJgRB_tQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lfo72b8i.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Dear,
Based on these 2 messages [1,2], what is the consensus between
git-fetch and url-fetch?
Pushing to SWH when linting appears to me winning the pros/cons. Even
if SWH should eventually fetch http://guix.gnu.org/sources.json soon.
And the other big pros from my point of view is the content-addressed
Git references.
Well, does it make sense to state on a recommended method?
All the best,
simon
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-03/msg00091.html
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 18:41, Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> wrote:
> url-fetch requires less bandwidth, and does not depend on 'git'.
>
> Though the most important distinction is that uploaded releases
> sometimes contain pre-processed sources (e.g. documentation) that need
> additional dependencies or scripts when building from the raw repository
> (this is why you often need to add autoconf, libtool & friends as inputs
> when building Autotools projects from git).
>
> I don't know whether there is a difference between the uploaded fmt
> zipball and the git repository.
[2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-03/msg00189.html
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 15:39, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> Other considerations:
>
> - Bandwidth requirement for source code downloads has never been a
> criterion so far.
>
> - Git references are nice because they’re (roughly) content-addressed.
>
> - ‘guix lint -c archival’ archives Git references on Software
> Heritage; it does not archive tarballs (though SWH will do it
> for us eventually.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-13 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200306091524.5044.11103@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <20200306091525.E8A1621163@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
2020-03-06 14:37 ` 01/02: gnu: fmt: Use HTTPS and git-fetch Marius Bakke
2020-03-06 15:07 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2020-03-06 17:40 ` Marius Bakke
2020-03-07 7:46 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2020-03-07 11:37 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2020-03-11 14:39 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-03-11 14:54 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2020-05-13 1:08 ` zimoun [this message]
2020-05-13 8:24 ` best practise between git-fetch vs url-fetch? Brice Waegeneire
2020-05-13 18:07 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2020-05-14 16:16 ` Jack Hill
2020-05-24 20:04 ` Josh Marshall
2020-05-24 20:30 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-05-25 4:54 ` Jack Hill
2020-05-25 21:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-05-26 2:05 ` Jack Hill
2020-05-13 17:13 ` Leo Famulari
2020-05-24 20:34 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-05-26 11:41 ` zimoun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJ3okZ0v3VvmT=eWAVeAQoFqZh4L3H4tUkEJn1-5EXcJgRB_tQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=mail@ambrevar.xyz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).