From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Towards reproducibly Jupyter notebooks with Guix-Jupyter
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:49:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ0gJbsTfYmLZtYeW4SczNSixO9vLnjcysYoucg8RVricg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87imorqx0w.fsf@inria.fr>
 <m1zhhuclf0.fsf@ordinateur-de-catherine--konrad.home>
 <87y2xd5bmb.fsf@inria.fr> <m1zhhtt4nk.fsf@fastmail.net>
 <87ftjih226.fsf@inria.fr> <m1sgnhqiyp.fsf@fastmail.net>
 <m18sp3d4cd.fsf@ordinateur-de-catherine--konrad.home>
 <87pnifsijm.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200227142529.i5ryhiwfdfswkvbo@thebird.nl>
 <CAJ3okZ1xiSGB_+sRHoixSwPxMQ4w8ABTSrNSx2cvP-LBDYOnrg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200227181149.jlvao3ywzrvfsrzj@thebird.nl>
 <CAJ3okZ3eC8HBxRTGCMPRbuU8_S3ox2fxRDFq-Y7Zs1_kJMatRQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEwRq=rzYy6=6vt3PZjiFtj8TZU-c1rT6_okm_8BZdy06ezaRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39022)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>) id 1j7OEV-0004LV-2r
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:50:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>) id 1j7OEU-0000q6-2z
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:50:02 -0500
Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]:41245)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>)
 id 1j7OET-0000pq-VU
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:50:02 -0500
Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id b5so394148qkh.8
 for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:50:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAEwRq=rzYy6=6vt3PZjiFtj8TZU-c1rT6_okm_8BZdy06ezaRQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 19:43, Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hello
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 7:20 PM zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Because other kernels are named: python-ipykernel or ruby-iruby.
> > Another: python-pari-jupyter.
> > And another other: jupyter-guile-kernel.
> > Well, there is no real convention yet, if I understand correctly.
> >
> > A good move should to start a gnu/packages/jupyter.scm to put all the
> > Jupyter related machinery inside... I do not know.
>
> Maybe we can help them show up properly in guix search results, like
> adding what could be missing in description.

Hum? I am not convinced that something is missing in the
description... I mean "guix search jupyter kernel | less" does already
the job, IMHO.
What should be missing is some convention in the naming scheme; and it
seems easier to force a convention when all the same related packages
live in the same file.


All the best,
simon