From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zimoun Subject: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0? Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:02:32 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39435) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqIn2-0000Ed-Hr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:02:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqIn0-000787-No for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:02:48 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]:35647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqIn0-00076z-Jm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:02:46 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id r21so34023036qke.2 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:02:44 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Guix Devel Dear, I am packaging bunch of Flow Cytometry packages and `flowPeaks` says Artistic 1.0 license. See https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/manuals/flowPeaks/man/flowPeaks.pdf And in `license.scm` there is only the 2.0. Because I am not an expert about the licenses, which one select for the package. Thank you in advance. All the best, simon