From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 22:13:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ0Tfm4KrzvjpMku8=E5-83ChH7PZ=Y2ore_m8HXd8qi5g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87pnglj2ka.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ3X5DZ3DVDXY5_WHEOzL01=nJGkJeBHZxL-1eLS3x8c8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87sglgsiey.fsf@lassieur.org> <878sn8inru.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87o8w4mewg.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv5wfdrm.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37459)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>) id 1ii36r-0000uD-AR
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:13:26 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>) id 1ii36q-0007Cs-2M
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:13:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87tv5wfdrm.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment_Lassieur?= <clement@lassieur.org>

Hi,

On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 18:04, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> wrote:

> So the question is: shall we add --load-path to all commands instead?
> (If not already the case.)

Please comment patches #38678.

https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38678


All the best,
simon