From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Parameterized packages
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:34:48 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ06mK+zNrEWMXvonioRKS86d1bnzBc0Se=Pwuxx00hWdA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJ3okZ23X5Y10XN+gReoiyM+766BUMNW4BqCWQqHHpMr6piMRA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87d0bfrxr1.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv4qjy06.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ0ZN6UKkUN4=C5gXxmFOq+nSHFMrhTR=+SZCesyVog5Ag@mail.gmail.com>
 <875zh6rm5h.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ1VsYDaBj_Uqwe28VPR1npjZpRech990Q+LKaGE+6xmXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87lfq1q7ea.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ1p1m+kj=hf2iSzE0C5NKy-5=jbun6_t9QuDW=+O9sd6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <87zhefq0ih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ1XKXnsiGE_W7pF5Ug_vM7jv7Lz2ndBCig5DiTzeChpNw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200124215645.dalemg5qbkpai37m@n0>
 <CAJ3okZ1Ps0rn3Fe=3eEvOK3A0Z5O0FtdX=OJt6UZMu5cgyzEBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87imkxcil8.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ0FgrDOYARieXcST-1K71KQshKafYqz6V-wcfr62hqHEg@mail.gmail.com>
 <877e1dce3g.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38921)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>) id 1iw3bb-0007zA-UG
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:35:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>) id 1iw3ba-0006Ol-S3
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:35:03 -0500
Received: from mail-qk1-x732.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::732]:45828)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>)
 id 1iw3ba-0006Nt-ML
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:35:02 -0500
Received: by mail-qk1-x732.google.com with SMTP id x1so9339518qkl.12
 for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 04:35:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <877e1dce3g.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 12:51, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> wrote:
>
> zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Maybe I misread. :-)
> > I am still convinced that it is not the correct design and instead be
> > able to partially override the package definition seems more
> > appropriate.
>
> If you have another design in mind that supports parameter composition, p=
lease
> do share :)

H=C3=A9h=C3=A9, you are kidding, right? :-)

Maybe improving how to override a package... :-D
Maybe something similar to Nix... which claims composition. ;-)

https://nixos.org/nixos/nix-pills/override-design-pattern.html
https://nixos.org/nixos/nix-pills/nixpkgs-overriding-packages.html

Anyway.
I should misunderstand something and should miss a key point.
You could explain me IRL at Guix Days in the front of the beer you owe me. =
;-)


Cheers,
simon