From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id WFfkAoM0Y19HFQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:03:47 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 8GtBOoI0Y19kHwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:03:46 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B07B79403C8 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46746 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIqlV-0006hb-Lb for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 06:03:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58074) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIqjo-0004kc-RV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 06:02:00 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x732.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::732]:35629) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIqjl-0002MV-Ll for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 06:02:00 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x732.google.com with SMTP id q5so1616833qkc.2 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 03:01:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ITzL4ft6u21+nICXH7jeYk2DZIXlCzb2zHtvZ0sHKN4=; b=GbmpjhDudT+/MGd4g8GdltWBzcvrLNLM6dpm4lTakXNl8pr7Tv46xYowHm5zDodhVF ejaqU2skMv1hgNOkJr9C0MwMPXTmAVaazWg1C3x6om/FJjvTWxICfdNUY1zsQiyeVMOQ jKg3dUkDTMMWnZ1uPdqM5kiSTtT9U//Wqhd4W0GrSKZ1MXks86EHgROGhJu/fdtlORrq ronngagoQD4HAZNSHgXNC7HvkcYs6Flvimi0M1LTrjq4HuP7HN2ajSwUmEhpAt7FFp34 D/4rLWWbwlem3CSgvhSwnW/sBSNburrx5J46lRDnxoU3pSm1iUIMeXYkAKB5v7+/yKYL /O7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ITzL4ft6u21+nICXH7jeYk2DZIXlCzb2zHtvZ0sHKN4=; b=hTisGOen98HOpKAphoWrHIsIe6hxia14VRKqehb8hEDng1HHW5NjbgjWpFH8qZT56R hYyN7ES9W4S95vStv2DAVeccB4/zRFHoONzYnSs82skCWIFw1YtLEVMkbMv58aRQsG94 8rDUxr5qyAVGN+FRTo1sI6fvdOFBYfrnrhlXMLoDvouMaXiv3pPnDyj+mZai6tWIIWYI tTzF8CKv78DS6Vfq28dB47GKbzO5FoDW6fltisRFWddEzUMczhYhPvowQxUjmZzvG1DD Q5tjgGQidiP3+y7L2WuFt7vrGtv2FaksPxHmAvMOuJ9HFPW2trIW7SbZqN0ZcSW2TYza wbRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533x6Db5ijbsRHha0aAZM29iXCC0Ai9VADIWimCMNa2e643VxHOZ 9k3RVtZc6tVX9oU+REt4g3rNIm8NvFf+v/lQP6o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1XpMx6MwybgWawMNXI6k+Gum/BkUhNM+ZE9JvNrmuVtiEr48+XRiilmR50EGTNlM6hnda32+jEzOZeMVJCIg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:53a:: with SMTP id h26mr27069368qkh.232.1600336915982; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 03:01:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87zh5pvj64.fsf@elephly.net> <87wo0tvdp1.fsf@elephly.net> <87r1r1v9ue.fsf@elephly.net> In-Reply-To: From: zimoun Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 12:01:44 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OUTREACHY] toward a proposal? To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::732; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x732.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=GbmpjhDu; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.09 X-TUID: glmYGoccQ4uF Hi G=C3=A1bor, On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 10:12, G=C3=A1bor Boskovits wr= ote: > I have read the proposal. All in all it looks good to me. One section > that could be > improved is the requirement on the setup. We usually state having guix > installed as > a requirement, even maybe a development setup. As initial contribution > we usually > ask for packaging something simple. We should also have a look at the com= munity > details, like the communication channels, and try to uniformize them > across the proposals. > I will check how it was phrased in the past, see if there is any new > info now, and try to > come up with something. Thank you. Do you know if the past submissions have been publicly archived somewhere? Cheers, simon