From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2xhZXMgV2FsbGluICjpn4vlmInoqqAp?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Update pumpa to 0.9.1. Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:31:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87twtek9hv.fsf@openmailbox.org> <1436366349-3669-1-git-send-email-gnu@clacke.user.lysator.liu.se> <1436366349-3669-2-git-send-email-gnu@clacke.user.lysator.liu.se> <877fqaqk7l.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87egkh8bq6.fsf@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149c2e8c88776051a8131a3 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDTj9-0003Xk-0f for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 04:32:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDTj4-0004KW-J3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 04:32:10 -0400 Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se ([130.236.254.3]:36264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDTj4-0003Qj-2x for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 04:32:06 -0400 Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB90940033 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:31:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com (mail-oi0-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14AA840033 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:31:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by oihr66 with SMTP id r66so150741793oih.2 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 01:31:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87egkh8bq6.fsf@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mathieu Lirzin Cc: guix-devel --089e0149c2e8c88776051a8131a3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Jul 9, 2015 7:49 PM, "Mathieu Lirzin" wrote: > > One last thing before pushing. :) > > Following the > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-07/msg00235.html > discussion, I want to know if the usage of the email address > instead of > in your patch was intentionnal? Do you mean the opposite? I use gnu@ on the list, but I would like my patches (and AUTHORS) to use @greatsino. I think that's what I did? > PS: There is no need to use "git send-mail ..." here. Just attach the > file generated by "git format-patch origin/master" to your answer. The advantage I see with git send-mail is that the patch is readable inline when reading the list archive and list mail, and in the case of a multi-step patch it neatly groups patches together ... when you do it right. --089e0149c2e8c88776051a8131a3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Jul 9, 2015 7:49 PM, "Mathieu Lirzin" <mthl@openmailbox.org> wrote:
>
> One last thing before pushing. :)
>
> Following the
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-07/msg00235.html=
> discussion, I want to know if the usage of the email address
> <gnu@clacke.user.= lysator.liu.se> instead of
> <claes.wal= lin@greatsinodevelopment.com> in your patch was intentionnal?

Do you mean the opposite? I use gnu@ on the list, but I woul= d like my patches (and AUTHORS) to use @greatsino. I think that's what = I did?

> PS: There is no need to use "git send-mail ...&quo= t; here.=C2=A0 Just attach the
> file generated by "git format-patch origin/master" to your a= nswer.

The advantage I see with git send-mail is that the patch is = readable inline when reading the list archive and list mail, and in the cas= e of a multi-step patch it neatly groups patches together ... when you do i= t right.

--089e0149c2e8c88776051a8131a3--