On Jul 9, 2015 7:49 PM, "Mathieu Lirzin" <mthl@openmailbox.org> wrote:
>
> One last thing before pushing. :)
>
> Following the
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-07/msg00235.html
> discussion, I want to know if the usage of the email address
> <gnu@clacke.user.lysator.liu.se> instead of
> <claes.wallin@greatsinodevelopment.com> in your patch was intentionnal?

Do you mean the opposite? I use gnu@ on the list, but I would like my
patches (and AUTHORS) to use @greatsino. I think that's what I did?

> PS: There is no need to use "git send-mail ..." here.  Just attach the
> file generated by "git format-patch origin/master" to your answer.

The advantage I see with git send-mail is that the patch is readable inline
when reading the list archive and list mail, and in the case of a
multi-step patch it neatly groups patches together ... when you do it right.