On Wednesday, August 31, 2022, Liliana Marie Prikler < liliana.prikler@gmail.com> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, dem 31.08.2022 um 09:26 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > > Hi, > > > > guix-commits@gnu.org writes: > > > > > civodul pushed a commit to branch master > > > in repository guix. > > > > > > commit 23152ff70f0ed4966d8207846f54c793d7cb4f86 > > > Author: Petr Hodina > > > AuthorDate: Tue Jan 4 06:58:51 2022 +0100 > > > > > > gnu: Add fwupd. > > > > > > * gnu/packages/firmware.scm (fwupd): New variable. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Courtès > > > > Just a quick question: does this tool talks to a remote server that > > serves non-free software as well as free one? If so, it'd need to be > > patched to comply with the FSDG. > I'd be surprised if it supplied free software as well as non-free one. > > The vendor guide[1] states the following: > > Do I have to contribute any code? > > > > No, unless you're using a custom update protocol that fwupd does not > > already support. > > The user guide[2] likewise states: > > The OEM vendor is in full control over what models are supported and is > > the only entity that can add support for new hardware. > > The vendor agreement[3] further grants no freedom safe for the second – > the freedom to make unmodified copies. > > Cheers > > [1] https://fwupd.org/lvfs/docs/vendors > [2] https://fwupd.org/lvfs/docs/users > [3] https://fwupd.org/lvfs/docs/agreement > > Isn't fwupd a package manager which could technically be replaced by guix?