From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id iNSOHstSzF4ZBgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 23:20:43 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id AKJDGstSzF6gUAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 23:20:43 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9533C940390 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 23:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40674 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdMOQ-0004lE-N1 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 19:20:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdMOI-0004l7-1q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 19:20:18 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-xe29.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::e29]:45921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdMO8-0002sC-9Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 19:20:17 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-xe29.google.com with SMTP id h25so2557469vsg.12 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 16:20:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/x7mB/PMRmq4jVViOmWpfaWw7fSC+mzB/8HHTO7cYYw=; b=Yl8s39uWNQmwwQH71YbnOst7lRcD2qOK3kLhfMEa44Qf2V3jsWc2h2WiZJtRmRboVW qwUpGB0Gqcd8PP0nPm/Drb82wJZWLYBmqsef3KdLBsMyikJINUpGfxJS6QO7aYUcRmme h7JNu19j5oofng0YxpC0Q5i19fZKNNtbHzbNDFVljPIw9oJ1ZYCJsQOi8VwbdxOK30Qv Vx/H+3vMjGscIxo7h4CznXQxOBBMG6HuJaWSj8fWJv7UXcS8Sb0yqvjowMuJkOX0ElkJ ZPPbGCWd4QM821aLMBjVrLjgpg45oGBv7L4aLJXOB/IBQmvvmVSoPc+p8AqhNpGjALhN m8Wg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/x7mB/PMRmq4jVViOmWpfaWw7fSC+mzB/8HHTO7cYYw=; b=J5py8fvpM/Hhb+Sm285VQctnQZOPA1E5fMdB5u/jj+z/kkOsg43Q0wDV5bzgtVQJ3Z D/PWTuSs5TsgL93OHEulOLDJmEBtJ4oMq3Xh4h0+awZ1UBz0s7zwEnfwH/Gabn8cSm3f oQ9FSz7xAymP9y6zXJIBLZ92f+MGBtPUYBuNIb0Psd3qPFGldoi6R8KUbNRP6194FTxT cnPouaLYcZe0x1jBwy24tJV+Hub/OrS+3rXVaz4Oi7XyRpOf4qAGwAg2ook1bwd1RB4W i+5pkpfUTqoxDRcz8kSp89VLEdzqTqS2jk0IfsL5k5Zyq9ZirtjgMLVq9aKQj6nfarZk 8BOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531jFxR6C5ZQB2An7WVnk19/xZ+jSk7m9a6s5IvcsLC0vunzXE4e HHGnyef8mxBljxC+IhA7+eq/beSCtmnstoN+Vss= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7gQfMB7HpInPVlWEOvnJ56jfyQ5Sj46c/kz9xYXfgQ5+OCqFk8yyqzBo3GlpWUxhatfbbXAkCy+iL3AlUN/A= X-Received: by 2002:a67:80ce:: with SMTP id b197mr15547928vsd.16.1590448807218; Mon, 25 May 2020 16:20:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87blmcmd9b.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> In-Reply-To: From: Josh Marshall Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 19:19:55 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Should guix track package aliases? To: zimoun Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000030106605a68138d5" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::e29; envelope-from=joshua.r.marshall.1991@gmail.com; helo=mail-vs1-xe29.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel , =?UTF-8?Q?Nicol=C3=B2_Balzarotti?= Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Yl8s39uW; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.09 X-TUID: I/hbWBVDuQIo --00000000000030106605a68138d5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" For gadl, it was that the gal website hosting it went down. With regards to pre-commit hooks, just to make sure each commit message conforms to what is expected and is best practice for PRs and commits for the project. On Mon, May 25, 2020, 19:15 zimoun wrote: > Dear Josh, > > On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 00:31, Josh Marshall > wrote: > > > I could fix up some of the new homepages. We've already seen some Gnu > related package losses like gdal. I think SWH adoption for packages may > want to be moved from as packages are added to as packages are updated -- > just to have a regular, low overhead, but still slow move to SWH. > > What do you mean by "losses like gdal"? > > BTW, if the method of package origin is 'git-fetch' then "guix lint" > should automatically queue the package to SWH. And I guess that the > Data Service or CI is linting, whatever the package is added or > updated. > The file 'sources.json' is updated every X minutes (or hours) and the > SWH fetcher should be ready really soon. And once this 'url-fetch' > from SWH is on production, a lot of packages will move to SWH. > > > Well, considering SWH, what is missing today IMHO on the Guix side is > UI, e.g., display using "guix weather" if the package is in SWH or > not, display a chart on the Data Service to represent which percentage > is in SWH, maybe move the {package,source}-json-builder from the > website engine to "guix publish", etc.. Help welcome. :-) > > > All the best, > simon > --00000000000030106605a68138d5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
For gadl, it was that the gal website hosting it went dow= n.=C2=A0 With regards to pre-commit hooks, just to make sure each commit me= ssage conforms to what is expected and is best practice for PRs and commits= for the project.

On Mon, May 25, 2020, 19:15 zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear Josh,

On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 00:31, Josh Marshall
<joshua.r.marshall.1991@gmail.com> wrote:

> I could fix up some of the new homepages.=C2=A0 We've already seen= some Gnu related package losses like gdal.=C2=A0 I think SWH adoption for = packages may want to be moved from as packages are added to as packages are= updated -- just to have a regular, low overhead, but still slow move to SW= H.

What do you mean by "losses like gdal"?

BTW, if the method of package origin is 'git-fetch' then "guix= lint"
should automatically queue the package to SWH.=C2=A0 And I guess that the Data Service or CI is linting, whatever the package is added or
updated.
The file 'sources.json' is updated every X minutes (or hours) and t= he
SWH fetcher should be ready really soon.=C2=A0 And once this 'url-fetch= '
from SWH is on production, a lot of packages will move to SWH.


Well, considering SWH, what is missing today IMHO on the Guix side is
UI, e.g., display using "guix weather" if the package is in SWH o= r
not, display a chart on the Data Service to represent which percentage
is in SWH, maybe move the {package,source}-json-builder from the
website engine to "guix publish", etc..=C2=A0 Help welcome. :-)

All the best,
simon
--00000000000030106605a68138d5--