From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id SKIYDDJHzF6xCAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 22:31:14 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id sJP/BzJHzF4qUgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 22:31:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7DA9403EC for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 22:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55858 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdLcm-00074k-UZ for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:31:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42008) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdLcO-00074a-J9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:30:49 -0400 Received: from mail-vk1-xa32.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::a32]:39935) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdLcN-0002FP-Bv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:30:48 -0400 Received: by mail-vk1-xa32.google.com with SMTP id 21so4600453vkq.6 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 15:30:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rJxHcSXJUfrd+U9B25vTX/wLX6qZXV5BGifKb9uSkNA=; b=YERNAeYzMTYm6S2vrRbAvvTct0N7GiFNzv2wH8JrRwzowsgfASmyd+NPpQv70c0aIW HqtYGkuvCYiuo1KtskwIVpg0mozzNtLLOYuecb+uUQQ4ZonAgwog4sMBHTmhxvhFVUbY mqPg5DITSFEh25iiweqXwULkOYveMFF6byf5j1myZ7Z7spUUgQZC5c2ll/9kyFBQPwHu 2owZI0ZMK64vPJDvzPJFe8ad9PEmuRgj1iVyiYvCoD+OWkIhdJxYhWPVQJ1E4lGCdxQt u7xgg4DelPt8JHvPg6QR9t5ZWRgIOmkTKE2YWB2Nxnd5Khe8AJrpJoMBYq2lgw4AHrrR itHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rJxHcSXJUfrd+U9B25vTX/wLX6qZXV5BGifKb9uSkNA=; b=E7q1AECap2bcTbtl/zV+lsYdZe3b+lNbC+Ui8DN7V0xaF04OXYCd1wxwmWxomUques lZOPpJD0tEaycuUgPhnusFS3HSgufq77EWx4ugjH5azUibO+zQUYWMImRJOkW1TND9py jnCQob32o/IfhJcbDfzSy7TigCE8uMJKG6z3j/SYdhjAN1PlIInvQ61wxSeS2WyNF4DU QHrrlallkx5cCXdUdAIWVN5dFiF7pCSZnNEcF5n4nLFhOerTL5L0nxTyn3rZl7AGBb67 wXVyRdnAA/tAmxaW/Om+mNzwuolNm/ixAm5jK+DLAwgcYP0prvpRKwscV62o8tUqgO7l P22A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532lPfMOEj9IdOEKgNR/3OFbvoE5JWEsEuAWGeYSAseu7W8+CjEX jS4W+8kp0oGzTLrzOMBXcybm1YbfZlWBNzGs2wM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxcplayqQ11NrXBpC7Bbxw/zizesx0WWv/gzTqc6W+KAe9gjnreJl4LyHwKBEoJhaKO/zEiVVBHMOUuBm56zaU= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:438d:: with SMTP id q135mr19864380vka.74.1590445844972; Mon, 25 May 2020 15:30:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87blmcmd9b.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> In-Reply-To: From: Josh Marshall Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 18:30:32 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Should guix track package aliases? To: Vincent Legoll Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009fc8bd05a68087e5" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::a32; envelope-from=joshua.r.marshall.1991@gmail.com; helo=mail-vk1-xa32.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel , =?UTF-8?Q?Nicol=C3=B2_Balzarotti?= Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=YERNAeYz; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.09 X-TUID: c49YLqnUmkCE --0000000000009fc8bd05a68087e5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I could fix up some of the new homepages. We've already seen some Gnu related package losses like gdal. I think SWH adoption for packages may want to be moved from as packages are added to as packages are updated -- just to have a regular, low overhead, but still slow move to SWH. On Mon, May 25, 2020, 17:57 Vincent Legoll wrote: > Hello, > > On 25/05/2020 16:20, Josh Marshall wrote: > > Checking out repology.org/repository/gnuguix > > , it got picked up and guix > > looks like it is in much better shape. > > Yay, but we're still far from the front page's top repositories... > > But, to celebrate our come back into the fray, I've grabbed a few low > hanging fruits from the outdated and/or potentially vulnerable list. > > Series incoming (on guix-patches, issue #41533)... > > -- > Vincent Legoll > --0000000000009fc8bd05a68087e5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I could fix up some of the new homepages.=C2=A0 We've= already seen some Gnu related package losses like gdal.=C2=A0 I think SWH = adoption for packages may want to be moved from as packages are added to as= packages are updated -- just to have a regular, low overhead, but still sl= ow move to SWH.

On Mon, May 25, 2020, 17:57 Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com> wrote:
=
Hello,

On 25/05/2020 16:20, Josh Marshall wrote:
> Checking out repology.org/repository/gnuguix
> <http://repology.org/repository/gnuguix= > , it got picked up and guix
> looks like it is in much=C2=A0better shape.

Yay, but we're still far from the front page's top repositories...<= br>
But, to celebrate our come back into the fray, I've grabbed a few low hanging fruits from the outdated and/or potentially vulnerable list.

Series incoming (on guix-patches, issue #41533)...

--
Vincent Legoll
--0000000000009fc8bd05a68087e5--