If that is an appropriate use, I'll go with that.  Prepare for a few
hundred reports.

On Thu, May 14, 2020, 04:19 Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> wrote:

>
> Josh Marshall <joshua.r.marshall.1991@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I'm trying to package watchman and have been poking at it for some weeks.
> > Things are getting a little large and more dependent packages are needed.
> > And this is still a spin off from me trying to update django which will
> > cause another huge backlog of package updates and additions.  I'd like
> some
> > more official way to track what code needs packaging and in what order.
> Is
> > there something for this?
>
> I sympathise, both with the rabbit hole you're going down, but also the
> issue around tracking all the work and interdependencies.
>
> My personal advice would be to file some bugs on debbugs.gnu.org against
> the guix-patches package, which is the approach for tracking patch
> submissions. Even if you don't have a patch to send yet, but are working
> on one, it still might be useful to have a bug open, as that indicates
> to others that there might be a patch available soon.
>
> You can mark bugs as "More information needed", which I've been using at
> least to categorise bugs that lack a patch, or where the patch won't be
> ready to merge for a little while. You can also mark one bug as blocking
> another.
>
> I'm also personally interested in getting Django 2 and 3 in to Guix, so
> let me know how that's going :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>